Background Superior vena cava (SVC) flow has become a surrogate measure of systemic blood flow in neonates.
Objective The aim of this study was to establish normal SVC flow values in healthy term infants the first 3 days of life and to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of the off-line analyses.
Design Doppler echocardiography of SVC flow was performed in 48 healthy term infants the first 3 days of life. Off-line analyses were thereafter performed by one cardiologist to investigate the changes in SVC flow from day 1 to day 3 and to establish normal values. Intra- and inter-observer variability was analysed in a subset of 20 infants by three paediatric cardiologists.
Results The authors found a decrease in mean SVC flow from 99 ml/kg/min at day 1 to 77 ml/kg/min at day 3. Reliable diameter images were obtained in 85% and velocity recordings in 81%. The mean variability of SVC flow was 17% in the intra-observer analysis and 29% in the inter-observer analysis.
Conclusion The main challenge of the method is the measurement of SVC diameter. The same observer should ideally perform sequential analyses. Special caution should be taken when making clinical implications from non-optimal pictures.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding Funding was received from the Department of Research at Oslo University Hospital, Ulleval, and the Unexpected Child Death Society of Norway.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics and the Scientific Committee at Oslo University Hospital, Ulleval, Oslo, Norway.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Detail has been removed from this case description or these case descriptions to ensure anonymity. The editors and reviewers have seen the detailed information available and are satisfied that the information backs up the case the authors are making.