Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effect of spontaneous breathing on umbilical venous blood flow and placental transfusion during delayed cord clamping in preterm lambs
  1. Emma Brouwer1,
  2. Arjan B te Pas1,
  3. Graeme R Polglase2,3,
  4. Erin V McGillick2,3,
  5. Stefan Böhringer4,
  6. Kelly J Crossley2,3,
  7. Karyn Rodgers2,
  8. Douglas Blank5,6,
  9. Shigeo Yamaoka2,
  10. Andrew William Gill7,
  11. Martin Kluckow8,
  12. Stuart B Hooper2,9
  1. 1 Neonatology, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
  2. 2 The Ritchie Centre, The Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4 Biomedical Data Sciences, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
  5. 5 Newborn Research, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  6. 6 The Ritchie Centre, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  7. 7 Centre for Neonatal Research and Education, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  8. 8 Department of Neonatology, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
  9. 9 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Stuart B Hooper, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia; stuart.hooper{at}monash.edu

Abstract

Introduction During delayed umbilical cord clamping, the factors underpinning placental transfusion remain unknown. We hypothesised that reductions in thoracic pressure during inspiration would enhance placental transfusion in spontaneously breathing preterm lambs.

Objective Investigate the effect of spontaneous breathing on umbilical venous flow and body weight in preterm lambs.

Methods Pregnant sheep were instrumented at 132–133 days gestational age to measure fetal common umbilical venous, pulmonary and cerebral blood flows as well as arterial and intrapleural (IP) pressures. At delivery, doxapram and caffeine were administered to promote breathing. Lamb body weights were measured continuously and breathing was assessed by IP pressure changes.

Results In 6 lambs, 491 out of 1117 breaths were analysed for change in body weight. Weight increased in 46.6% and decreased in 47.5% of breaths. An overall mean increase of 0.02±2.5 g per breath was calculated, and no net placental transfusion was observed prior to cord clamping (median difference in body weight 52.3 [−54.9–166.1] g, p=0.418). Umbilical venous (UV) flow transiently decreased with each inspiration, and in some cases ceased, before UV flow normalised during expiration. The reduction in UV flow was positively correlated with the standardised reduction in (IP) pressure, increasing by 109 mL/min for every SD reduction in IP pressure. Thus, the reduction in UV flow was closely related to inspiratory depth.

Conclusions Spontaneous breathing had no net effect on body weight in preterm lambs at birth. UV blood flow decreased as inspiratory effort increased, possibly due to constriction of the inferior vena cava caused by diaphragmatic contraction, as previously observed in human fetuses.

  • animal research
  • neonatology
  • physiology
  • resuscitation
  • placental transfusion

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors EB, ABtP, GRP, AWG, MK and SBH were responsible for the conception and design of the experiments. EB, GRP, EVM, SB, KJC, KR, SY, DB, SBH were each involved in acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data. EB, ABtP, SBH drafted the article and all coauthors have contributed to and approved the final version to be published.

  • Funding This research was supported by an NHMRC Programme Grant (APP 1113902) and the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Programme. ABtP was the recipient of a Vidi grant, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), part of the Innovational Research Incentives Scheme Veni-Vidi-Vici (NWO-Vidi 2015/2016). SBH was supported by an NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (APP1058537).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Monash University’s Monash Medical Centre Animal Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Correction notice This paper has been updated since it was published Online First. Figures 3 and 4 were the same in the original manuscript and so figure 3 has now been updated.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

Linked Articles

  • Fantoms
    Ben J Stenson