To compare the effects of intermittent and continuous feedings on pulmonary function, we studied 24 very low birth weight neonates (mean +/- SD: birth weight, 1.2 +/- 0.3 kg; gestational age, 30.5 +/- 1.1 weeks) at 2 to 4 weeks of age. All infants had a previous diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome but no subsequent diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pulmonary mechanics were measured before the beginning of intermittent or continuous feedings and 10 minutes after each meal was completed. Twelve infants were randomly assigned to intermittent and 12 to continuous feedings. These infants had similar birth weight, gestational age, study age, and baseline lung function. After intermittent feedings, there was a significant decrease in tidal volume (38%), minute ventilation (44%), and dynamic compliance (28%), whereas pulmonary resistance increased significantly (100%). In comparison, the pulmonary function data remained unchanged after continuous feedings. These data demonstrate that intermittent feeding of very low birth weight infants can lead to airflow and respiratory instability. These adverse effects appear to be dependent on the rate that feedings are administered. A slower pace of feeding may be more advantageous for infants prone to respiratory instability.