Percutaneous central catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters have similar infection rates in very low birth weight infants

J Perinatol. 1999 Jun;19(4):251-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200182.

Abstract

Objective: We performed this study to determine if percutaneous central lines (PCLs) were associated with infection more often than peripherally placed intravenous catheters (PIVs).

Study design: We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of 53 infants with PCLs inserted from March 1993 to February 1995 for evidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection and 97 cohorts with PIVs who were matched to the infants with PCLs by admission date and birth weight. We considered an infant to have catheter-related bloodstream infection if bacteremia occurred while the PCL or PIV was in place with no other identifiable infection focus. Statistical analyses were performed by using either Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test where appropriate.

Results: There were eight infections per 1000 catheter days of PCL use and nine infections per 1000 catheter days of PIV use.

Conclusion: PCLs do not become infected more often than PIVs.

MeSH terms

  • Bacteremia / etiology*
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / adverse effects*
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / adverse effects*
  • Gestational Age
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Very Low Birth Weight*
  • Retrospective Studies