Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Unintentional exposure of neonates to conventional radiography in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the extent of unintentional exposure to X-rays performed during routine diagnostic procedures in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

Study Design:

During a 1-month period, 157 consecutive neonates from five level-III NICUs were recruited for this study. The mean birth weight was 1747±911 g (range: 564–4080 g), and gestational age was 31.6±3.6 weeks (range: 24–41 weeks). A total of 500 radiographs were performed including chest (68%), abdomen (17%) and combined chest and abdomen (15%). The average number of radiographs taken per infant was 4.2±3.6 (range: 1–21). Unintentional inclusion of body regions other than those ordered was determined by comparing the areas that should be included in the radiation field according to International recommendations, to those that appeared in the actual radiograph.

Result:

A comparison of the recommended borders to the actual boundaries of the radiographs taken show an additional exposure to radiation in all three procedures: 85% of chest radiographs also included the whole abdomen, 64% of abdomen radiographs included both thigh and upper chest and 62% of chest and abdomen radiograph included the thigh. (The range in all procedures was from ankle to upper head.) Between 2 and 20% of the relevant targeted body tissues were not included in the exposed fields resulting in missing data. The gonads of both sexes were exposed in 7% in all chest X-rays. Among male infants, the testes were exposed in 31% of plain abdomen radiographs and 34% of chest and abdomen radiographs.

Conclusion:

In the NICUs participating in the study, neonates are currently being exposed to X-ray radiation in nonrelevant body regions. Higher awareness and training of the medical teams and radiographers are required to minimize unnecessary exposure of newborns to ionizing radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee KG, Cloherty JP . Identifying the high risk newborn and evaluating gestational age, prematurity, postmaturity, large for gestational age and small for gestational age infants. In: Cloherty JP, Eichenwald EC and Stark AR (eds). Manual of Neonatal Care, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, 2004, pp 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martin JA, Kochanek KD, Strobino DM, Guyer B, MacDorman MF . Annual summary of vital statistics. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 619–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vohr RB, Allen M . Extreme prematurity—the continuing dilemma. N Engl J Med 2004; 352: 71–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutton PM, Arthur RJ, Taylor C, Stringer MD . Ionizing radiation from diagnostic X rays in very low birth weight babies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 78: F227–F229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson-Costello D, Rao PS, Morrision S, Hack M . Radiation exposure from diagnostic radiographs in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1996; 97: 369–374.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson A, Dellagrammaticas HD . Radiation doses to neonates requiring intensive care. Br J Radiol 1983; 56: 397–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barcham N, Egan I, Dowd S . Gonadal protection methods in neonatal chest radiography. Radiol Technol 1997; 69 (2): 157–161.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Rooij DG, van de Kant HJ, Dol R, Wagemaker G, van Buul PP, van Duijn-Goedhart A et al. Long-term effects of irradiation before adulthood on reproductive function in the male rhesus monkey. Biol Reprod 2002; 66 (2): 486–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haines GA, Hendry JH, Daniel CP, Morris ID . Germ cell and dose-dependent DNA damage measured by the comet assay in murine spermatozoa after testicular X-irradiation. Biol Reprod 2002; 67 (3): 854–861.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Soboleski D, Theriault C, Acker A, Dagnone V, Manson D . Unnecessary irradiation to non-thoracic structures during pediatric chest radiography. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Radiation Protection in Pediatric Radiology. NCRP Report No. 68, Washington 1981.

  12. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann IRCP Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; 112: 28–29.

  13. European Commission. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in Pediatrics. EUR 1996; 16261: 1–71.

  14. Stewart A, Webb J, Giles D, Hewitt D . Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero. Lancet 1956; 2: 447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Environmental Health. Risk of ionizing radiation exposure to children: a subject review. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 717–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS . Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 951–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Slovis TL . Children, computed tomography radiation dose and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 971–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cook JV, Kyriou J, Pettet A, Fitzgerald M, Shah K, Pablot SM . Key factor in the optimizing of pediatric X ray practice. Br J Radiol 2001; 74: 1032–1040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Preston RJ . Radiation biology: concepts for radiation protection. Health Phys 2004; 87 (1): 3–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms Maya Bader and Ms Samara Brown for their help in editing this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Bader.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bader, D., Datz, H., Bartal, G. et al. Unintentional exposure of neonates to conventional radiography in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units. J Perinatol 27, 579–585 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211792

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211792

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links