Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Effect of Inborn versus Outborn Delivery on Clinical Outcomes in Ventilated Preterm Neonates: Secondary Results from the NEOPAIN Trial

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of birth center (inborn versus outborn) on morbidity and mortality for preterm neonates (23 to 32 weeks) using data collected prospectively within a uniform protocol.

STUDY DESIGN:

Secondary analyses of data from the NEurologic Outcomes & Pre-emptive Analgesia In Neonates (NEOPAIN) trial (n=898) were performed to evaluate the effect of inborn versus outborn delivery on neonatal outcomes, including the occurrence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), chronic lung disease (CLD), and mortality.

RESULTS:

Outborn babies were more likely to have severe IVH (p=0.0005); this increased risk persisted after controlling for severity of illness. When adjustments for antenatal steroids were added, the effect of birth center was no longer significant. Neither the occurrences of PVL or CLD nor mortality were significantly different between the inborn and outborn infants.

CONCLUSION:

Outborn babies are more likely to have severe IVH than inborn babies, perhaps because their mothers are less likely to receive antenatal steroids. Improvements in antenatal steroid administration to high-risk women may substantially reduce neonatal morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Evdokia Dimitriadis, Daniel L. Rolnik, … Ellen Menkhorst

References

  1. Yeast JD, Poskin M, Stockbauer JW, et al. Changing patterns in regionalization of perinatal care and the impact on neonatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:131–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Synnes AR, Chien LY, Peliowski A, et al. Variations in intraventricular hemorrhage incidence rates among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. J Pediatr 2001;138:525–531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Lewit EM, et al. Hospital and patient characteristics associated with variation in 28-day mortality rates for very low birth weight infants. Vermont Oxford Network. Pediatrics 1997;99:149–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sankaran K, Chien LY, Walker R, et al. Variations in mortality rates among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Can Med Assoc J 2002;166:173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kitchen W, Ford G, Orgill A, et al. Outcome of extremely low birth-weight infants in relation to the hospital of birth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;24:1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Towers CV, Bonebrake R, Padilla G, et al. The effect of transport on the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:291–295.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chien LY, Whyte R, Aziz K, et al. Improved outcome of preterm infants when delivered in tertiary care centers. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:247–252.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, et al. The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA 1996;276:1054–1059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kollee LA, Brand R, Schreuder AM, et al. Five-year outcome of preterm and very low birth weight infants: a comparison between maternal and neonatal transport. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:635–638.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Warner B, Musial MJ, Chenier T, et al. The effect of birth hospital type on the outcome of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004;113:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SK, McMillan DD, Ohlsson A, et al. The benefit of preterm birth at tertiary care centers is related to gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:617–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anand KJ, Hall RW, Desai N, et al. Effects of morphine analgesia in ventilated preterm neonates: primary outcomes from the NEOPAIN randomised trial. Lancet 2004;363:1673–1682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarnow-Mordi W, Parry G . The CRIB score. Lancet 1993;342:1365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, et al. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr 1978;92:529–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ment LR, Bada HS, Barnes P, et al. Practice parameter: neuroimaging of the neonate: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 2002;58:1726–1738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perlman JM, Rollins N . Surveillance protocol for the detection of intracranial abnormalities in premature neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:822–826.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maalouf EF, Duggan PJ, Counsell SJ, et al. Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2001;107:719–727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright LL, Horbar JD, Gunkel H, et al. Evidence from multicenter networks on the current use and effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids in low birth weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:263–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller TC, Densberger M, Krogman J . Maternal transport and the perinatal denominator. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;147:19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fanaroff AA MR (ed). Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine, 7th edn, vol 1. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 31, 309–410.

  21. Chien LY, Ohlsson A, Seshia MM, et al. Variations in antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a persistent problem despite 30 years of evidence. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:401–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Creasy RK RR (ed). Maternal–Fetal Medicine, 4th edn, vol 1. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Company; 1999. p. 515–521.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (HD36484 to K.J.S. Anand, HD36270 to B.A. Barton), from the Chief Scientist's Office of the Scottish Executive (to N. McIntosh), from the Swedish Research Council, Vardal Foundation and Free Masons, Sweden (to H. Lagercrantz and L.L. Bergqvist), from the Fondation pour la Santé CNP, France (to R. Carbajal and R. Lenclen), and from the Örebro University Hospital Research Foundation, Sweden (to J. Schollin and M. Eriksson). We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of all the physicians, nurses, pharmacists, ultrasonographers, occupational and physical therapists at the participating institutions, and the parents who gave consent for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

NEOPAIN=NEurologic Outcomes & Pre-emptive Analgesia In Neonates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmer, K., Kronsberg, S., Barton, B. et al. Effect of Inborn versus Outborn Delivery on Clinical Outcomes in Ventilated Preterm Neonates: Secondary Results from the NEOPAIN Trial. J Perinatol 25, 270–275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211239

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211239

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links