Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Can Oral Sucrose Reduce the Pain and Distress Associated with Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Infants undergoing eye exams to screen for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) demonstrate physiologic and behavioral manifestations of pain and distress. Oral sucrose has analgesic properties that might reduce these effects.

AIM:

To determine the efficacy of oral sucrose in reducing the pain/distress of eye exams for ROP.

METHODS:

A total of 32 infants about to undergo ROP screening exams received either oral sucrose [S] (N=16) or sterile water [C] (N=16) in a randomized, prospective and blinded fashion. Outcome measures included HR, RR, O2 saturation, BP, pain (premature infant pain profile) and percent of time spent crying during the eye exam.

RESULTS:

The groups were similar in GA (weeks) (28±1.6), BW (kg) (1.04±0.26), postnatal age (days) 50.8±20.3, and study weight (kg) 1.88±0.40). Both groups demonstrated significant increases in HR, BP, and pain score in response to the exam. Infants in both groups spent the majority of time actively crying during the exam ([S] 53±35% vs [C] 63±31%. Infants receiving [S] showed a small but significant drop in O2 saturation. No significant differences were seen between groups in physiologic or behavioral responses to the eye exam.

CONCLUSION:

Oral [S] was not effective in reducing pain/distress from the ROP screening exam. Alternative strategies should be considered to achieve adequate pain relief.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 5th Ed., EKK Gene Village, ILL, USA: American Academy of Pediatrics 2002 p. 247–248.

  2. Isenberg S, Everett S . Cardiovascular effects of mydriatics in low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1984;105:111–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laws DE, Morton C, Weindling M, Clark D . Systemic effects of screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:425–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hermansen AC, Sullivan S . Feeding intolerance following ophthalmologic examination. Am J Dis Child 1985;139:367–368.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saunders RA, Miller KW, Hunt HH . Topical anesthesia during eye examination: does it reduce stress? Ann Ophthalmol 1993;25:436–439.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Slevin M, Murphy JF, Daly L, O'Keefe M . Retinopathy of prematurity screening, stress related responses, the role of nesting. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:762–764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A . Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Neonatal Rev www.cochraneneonatal.

  8. Anand KJ, International Evidence Based Group for Neonatal Pain. Concensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:173–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A . Premature infant pain profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain 1996;12:13–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grabska, J., Walden, P., Lerer, T. et al. Can Oral Sucrose Reduce the Pain and Distress Associated with Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity?. J Perinatol 25, 33–35 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211199

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211199

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links