Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 96, November 2015, Pages 252-259
Resuscitation

Clinical Paper
Outcomes of preterm infants following the introduction of room air resuscitation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

After 2006 most neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada stopped initiating newborn resuscitation with 100% oxygen.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we compared neonatal outcomes in infants born at ≤27 weeks gestation that received <100% oxygen (OXtitrate group, typically 21–40% oxygen) during delivery room resuscitation to infants that received 100% oxygen (OX100 group).

Results

Data from 17 NICUs included 2326 infants, 1244 in the OXtitrate group and 1082 in the OX100 group. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for the primary outcome of severe neurologic injury or death was higher in the OXtitrate group compared with the OX100 group (AOR 1.36; 95% CI 1.11, 1.66). A similar increase was also noted when comparing infants initially resuscitated with room air to the OX100 group (AOR 1.33; 95% CI 1.04, 1.69). Infants in the OXtitrate group were less likely to have received either medical or surgical treatment for a patent ductus arteriosus (AOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.37, 0.74).

Conclusions

In Canadian NICUs, we observed a higher risk of severe neurologic injury or death among preterm infants of ≤27 weeks gestation following a change in practice to initiating resuscitation with either room air or an intermediate oxygen concentration.

Introduction

Guidelines for oxygen use during newborn resuscitation have changed repeatedly over the past 10 years as new evidence regarding the perils of excessive oxygen exposure became available. In 2005, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) published recommendations stating there was “insufficient evidence to specify the concentration of oxygen to be used at initiation of resuscitation”, which implied that it was reasonable to continue the standard practice of giving 100% oxygen at the start of resuscitation.1 Given mounting concerns about the dangers of hyperoxemia at birth, the Canadian Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) Committee issued an amendment in 2006 to recommend that newborn resuscitation should begin with room air, regardless of gestational age.2 The latest ILCOR recommendation, published in 2010, was updated to state that resuscitation of term infants should start with room air and that blended oxygen may be used for preterm infants.3 However, the recommendation also specifies that, where blended oxygen is not available, resuscitation should be initiated with room air. The most recent Canadian addendum to the 6th edition of the NRP textbook states that resuscitation should be started with room air for infants born at ≥32 weeks gestation, while oxygen concentrations for infants born at <32 weeks gestation should be guided by local protocols.4, 5

There is convincing evidence that 100% oxygen use in the delivery room can have far-reaching, clinically significant detrimental effects on outcomes for term infants.6, 7, 8 Several smaller studies comparing low versus high oxygen concentrations for the resuscitation of preterm infants have been published.6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 These studies failed to show differences in clinically meaningful outcomes, perhaps due to small sample sizes, and as a result there are still many unanswered questions about the safety of using different oxygen concentrations during resuscitation of very preterm infants. Nearly all infants in the low oxygen groups in these studies required an increase in the inspired concentration of oxygen (FiO2). While none of the studies showed differences in survival or severe injury, they did demonstrate high treatment failure rates for preterm infants initially resuscitated with 21–30% oxygen.

Following publication of the Canadian NRP amendment in 2006, most neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada changed their local resuscitation practices for preterm infants and began using either room air or an intermediate concentration of oxygen (e.g., 30–40% oxygen) at the start of resuscitation. Our study objective was to determine if neonatal outcomes for infants born at ≤27 weeks gestation changed following this modification in practice.

Section snippets

Study design and population

In this retrospective cohort study, we included infants born at a gestational age of 23–27 weeks between 2004 and 2009 who were inborn at participating Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) NICUs that stopped using a static concentration of 100% oxygen during resuscitation. To be included in the study, inborn infants must have been admitted to the NICU, or died prior to NICU admission despite resuscitation efforts. Infants were excluded from the study if they had severe congenital anomalies, were

Results

Of the 27 participating CNN centers during the period of interest, 17 centers contributed data: 6 NICUs were not eligible as they continued resuscitation with 100% oxygen and 4 NICUs did not respond to the questionnaire. Data collection for the OX100 (n = 1082 infants) and OXtitrate (n = 1244 infants) groups spanned 2004–2007 and 2006–2009, respectively. Details of the eligible infants and study flow are reported in Fig. 1. Of the 17 NICUs included in the study, 12 NICUs switched to initiating

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort study, the risk of severe neurologic injury or death increased in infants born at ≤27 weeks gestation following a change in local policies to begin resuscitation using less than 100% oxygen. This increased risk was observed both in infants that received 21% oxygen (room air) and those that received between 22 and 100% oxygen. If the magnitude of the observed change in our primary outcome is accurate, we estimate that following the change in policy we observed

Conclusions

This study reports a significant increase in severe neurologic injury or death for infants born ≤27 weeks gestation following changes to local policies in Canadian NICUs recommending the use of less than 100% oxygen during newborn resuscitation. Our results should not be interpreted as treatment recommendations. Rather, this study highlights an observed association between a change in policy at several institutions and various outcomes, which raises potential concerns about the use of room air

Funding source

No external funding was secured for this study. Organizational support to the Canadian Neonatal Network™ was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded Team in Maternal-Infant Care. Dr. Prakesh Shah holds an Applied Research Chair in Reproductive and Child Health Services and Policy Research awarded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have conflicts of interest to disclose.

Clinical trial registration

Not applicable.

Contributors’ statement

Yacov Rabi and Prakesh S Shah: Drs. Rabi and Shah conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised the acquisition of data, carried out the statistical analysis, reviewed and interpreted the data, drafted the initial manuscript, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Abhay Lodha: Dr. Lodha conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised the acquisition of data, carried out the statistical analysis,

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of the CNN Coordinating Centre for providing organizational support to the CNN and Ruth Warre for editorial assistance with this article. The CNN Coordinating Centre and Dr. Warre are based at the Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, which is supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto. Prakesh Shah is supported by an Applied Research Chair in

References (34)

  • O.D. Saugstad et al.

    Resuscitation of depressed newborn infants with ambient air or pure oxygen: a meta-analysis

    BiolNeonate

    (2005)
  • R. Escrig et al.

    Achievement of targeted saturation values in extremely low gestational age neonates resuscitated with low or high oxygen concentrations: a prospective, randomized trial

    Pediatrics

    (2008)
  • Y. Rabi et al.

    Room-air versus oxygen administration for resuscitation of preterm infants: the ROAR study

    Pediatrics

    (2011)
  • C.L. Wang et al.

    Resuscitation of preterm neonates by using room air or 100% oxygen

    Pediatrics

    (2008)
  • M. Vento et al.

    Resuscitation with room air instead of 100% oxygen prevents oxidative stress in moderately asphyxiated term neonates

    Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • V.S. Kapadia et al.

    Resuscitation of preterm neonates with limited versus high oxygen strategy

    Pediatrics

    (2013)
  • D. Rook et al.

    Resuscitation of preterm infants with different inspired oxygen fractions

    J Pediatr

    (2014)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Oxygen saturation (SpO2) targeting for newborn infants at delivery: Are we reaching for an impossible unknown?

      2021, Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In 2005, international expert committees conceded that “optimal initial fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) was unknown [12]. In 2006, Canada [13] and then Australia [14] changed their national guidelines to recommend initial resuscitation with air. This was subsequently followed by the Europeans, including UK, Finland, Sweden, Russia, the Netherlands and Spain [15].

    • Oxygen therapy in preterm infants with pulmonary hypertension

      2020, Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
    • 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

      2019, Resuscitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      All observational studies used 100% as the high initial oxygen concentration. A majority of RCTs (8 of 10)171–178 and all of the observational cohort studies180–183 used Spo2 targeting as a cointervention. All results are presented as RR with 95% CI and absolute difference with 95% CI.

    • Targeting Oxygen in Term and Preterm Infants Starting at Birth

      2019, Clinics in Perinatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Before 2006, preterm babies were initially resuscitated with 100% oxygen. Thereafter, the policy changed and babies received less than 100% oxygen that was blended according to Spo2.68 Adjusted OR for the primary outcome of severe neurologic injury or death was significantly higher in the low-oxygen group or room air than in the 100% oxygen group.68

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.012.

    1

    Department of Paediatrics, Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Foothills Medical Centre, Room C211, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 2T9.

    2

    Department of Paediatrics, Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital, 2888 Shaganappi Trail Northwest, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3B 6A8.

    3

    Department of Paediatrics, Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Sainte Justine University Health Center, 2900, boul. Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3T 1J4.

    4

    Department of Paediatrics, Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5.

    View full text