Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 83, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 97-100
Resuscitation

Simulation and education
The Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway™ (LMA): A new neonatal supraglottic device: Comparison with Classic and ProSeal LMA in a manikin

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.032Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

The study aims to compare the performances (ease of insertion, time to establish effective ventilation and maximal inflation pressure) of classic™ (cLMA), ProSeal™ (PLMA) and Supreme™ (SLMA) Laryngeal Mask Airway when used in a neonatal airway management manikin by inexperienced delivery room trainees. The quality of the three devices, as perceived by participants, was also evaluated.

Methods

Health-care professional trainees were given a brief supervised training with the three devices. Every trainee was then observed positioning each of the three different LMAs in a single occasion. Success rate, time (IT) and maximal inflation pressure (PImax) were recorded by a single unblinded observer. A 4-point scale was used to rate participants’ perceived quality.

Results

A total of 40 health-care professional trainees participated in the study.

There were five, three and one failed insertions at the first attempt with the cLMA, PLMA and SLMA, respectively. No failures to establish an effective airway within three attempts were recorded. The success rate at first attempt was comparable among the three devices. The mean IT was significantly lower with the SLMA as compared with PLMA (p < 0.01), but not to cLMA. The mean PImax was higher with SLMA than with cLMA and PLMA (p < 0.01). The ease of insertion as well as the effectiveness of ventilation were perceived by the participants as superior with SLMA as compared with cLMA and PLMA (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Neonatal SLMA is superior to PLMA in terms of time to establish effective ventilation; furthermore, maximal inflation pressure and quality perceived by the operator are higher with neonatal SLMA than with cLMA and PLMA. These manikin data could provide a useful guide for planning potential future clinical research involving the newly developed supraglottic device in neonates.

Section snippets

Subjects

Institutional board review approval was obtained. Health-care professional trainees of our regional perinatal level III centre, with no previous experience in LMA usage, were recruited.

Study design

The procedure was conducted based on a previous manikin study protocol.5 Participants received a standardised 15 min training on the cLMA, PLMA and SLMA for neonatal resuscitation. All LMAs were size 1, which are indicated for neonates weighting 2000–5000 g, according to the manufacturer's instructions.14 Training

Results

A total of 40 health-care professional trainees (12 paediatric residents, 15 anaesthesia residents, seven midwifery trainees and six nurse trainees) participated in the study.

There were five, three and one failed insertions at the first attempt with the cLMA, PLMA and SLMA, respectively. No failures to establish an effective airway within three attempts were recorded (Table 1). The success rate at first attempt was comparable among the three devices.

The IT was significantly lower with the SLMA

Discussion

This is the first study that evaluates the novel neonatal size 1 SLMA in a manikin. Our results show that SLMA performances were superior to those of cLMA and PLMA in terms of PImax and ease of insertion. Furthermore, participants expressed the highest satisfaction when using the SLMA.

Rapid establishment of a patent airway and effective ventilation is of utmost importance in neonatal resuscitation.1 Previous adult studies showed that these goals could be less invasively achieved with a

Conflict of interest statement

DT, MP, ND, CO and MM are involved in teaching for courses supported by an educational grant from The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, UK.

Financial disclosure

The authors have no financial disclosure to report. No funds were received for this work. The Supreme LMA prototypes were provided by The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, UK.

References (23)

  • M. Micaglio et al.

    Training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of the LMA- ProSeal™ and the LMA Classic™ in an airway management manikin

    Pediatr Anesth

    (2006)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Use of laryngeal mask for neonatal resuscitation in Brazil: A national survey

      2023, Resuscitation Plus
      Citation Excerpt :

      Training healthcare workers how to insert the LMA is much faster and easier than training them how to use tracheal intubation.29,30 In addition, studies show that brief training results in high rates of success on the first attempt of use of LMA because of ease of insertion and effectiveness of ventilation.31–33 Our study will need to be repeated after the introduction of LMA training by BNRP to see whether knowledge dissemination changes the availability and use of the device in the Brazilian neonatal settings.

    • The Pediatric Airway

      2019, A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children
    • The Pediatric Airway

      2018, A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children
    • Paediatric supraglottic airway devices update

      2017, Revista Colombiana de Anestesiologia
    • The Role of Supraglottic Airways in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

      2015, Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Compared with the LMA ProSeal, the LMA Supreme was found to be easier to insert and was associated with less pharyngeal injury in children.10 In a neonatal manikin study, the LMA Supreme was found to outperform the LMA Classic and LMA ProSeal.11 Compared with a newer second-generation device, the i-gel, the LMA Supreme was associated with higher first attempt success rates and faster times for successful insertion and had similar effectiveness in providing positive pressure ventilation.12

    • Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway versus Face Mask during Neonatal Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

      2015, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The SLMA was superior to the classic LMA with regard to insertion time and oropharyngeal seal pressure24; a further advantage is gastric access. A previous neonatal manikin study confirmed these findings, including higher level of satisfaction expressed by users.25 The results of this study add that a neonatal SLMA (size 1) is effective and safe also when used in the context of neonatal resuscitation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.032.

    View full text