Simulation and educationThe Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway™ (LMA): A new neonatal supraglottic device: Comparison with Classic and ProSeal LMA in a manikin☆
Section snippets
Subjects
Institutional board review approval was obtained. Health-care professional trainees of our regional perinatal level III centre, with no previous experience in LMA usage, were recruited.
Study design
The procedure was conducted based on a previous manikin study protocol.5 Participants received a standardised 15 min training on the cLMA, PLMA and SLMA for neonatal resuscitation. All LMAs were size 1, which are indicated for neonates weighting 2000–5000 g, according to the manufacturer's instructions.14 Training
Results
A total of 40 health-care professional trainees (12 paediatric residents, 15 anaesthesia residents, seven midwifery trainees and six nurse trainees) participated in the study.
There were five, three and one failed insertions at the first attempt with the cLMA, PLMA and SLMA, respectively. No failures to establish an effective airway within three attempts were recorded (Table 1). The success rate at first attempt was comparable among the three devices.
The IT was significantly lower with the SLMA
Discussion
This is the first study that evaluates the novel neonatal size 1 SLMA in a manikin. Our results show that SLMA performances were superior to those of cLMA and PLMA in terms of PImax and ease of insertion. Furthermore, participants expressed the highest satisfaction when using the SLMA.
Rapid establishment of a patent airway and effective ventilation is of utmost importance in neonatal resuscitation.1 Previous adult studies showed that these goals could be less invasively achieved with a
Conflict of interest statement
DT, MP, ND, CO and MM are involved in teaching for courses supported by an educational grant from The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, UK.
Financial disclosure
The authors have no financial disclosure to report. No funds were received for this work. The Supreme LMA prototypes were provided by The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, UK.
References (23)
- et al.
Part 11: neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
The size 1 LMA-ProSeal™: comparison with the LMA-Classic™ during pressure controlled ventilation in a neonatal intubation manikin
Resuscitation
(2007) - et al.
Prospective randomized comparison of ProSeal™ and Classic™ laryngeal mask airways in anaesthetized neonates and infants
Br J Anaesth
(2009) - et al.
LMA-Supreme – a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy
Br J Anaesth
(2008) - et al.
New airways for resuscitation?
Resuscitation
(2006) - et al.
Laryngeal mask airway: is the management of neonates requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth changing?
Resuscitation
(2004) - et al.
Delivery room resuscitation of near-term infants: role of the laryngeal mask airway
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
ILCOR advisory statement: resuscitation of the newly born infant
Pediatrics
(1999) 2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 7. Neonatal resuscitation
Resuscitation
(2005)International guidelines for neonatal resuscitation: an excerpt from the guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: international consensus on science
Pediatrics
(2000)
Training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of the LMA- ProSeal™ and the LMA Classic™ in an airway management manikin
Pediatr Anesth
Cited by (25)
Use of laryngeal mask for neonatal resuscitation in Brazil: A national survey
2023, Resuscitation PlusCitation Excerpt :Training healthcare workers how to insert the LMA is much faster and easier than training them how to use tracheal intubation.29,30 In addition, studies show that brief training results in high rates of success on the first attempt of use of LMA because of ease of insertion and effectiveness of ventilation.31–33 Our study will need to be repeated after the introduction of LMA training by BNRP to see whether knowledge dissemination changes the availability and use of the device in the Brazilian neonatal settings.
The Pediatric Airway
2019, A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and ChildrenThe Pediatric Airway
2018, A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and ChildrenPaediatric supraglottic airway devices update
2017, Revista Colombiana de AnestesiologiaThe Role of Supraglottic Airways in Pediatric Emergency Medicine
2015, Clinical Pediatric Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Compared with the LMA ProSeal, the LMA Supreme was found to be easier to insert and was associated with less pharyngeal injury in children.10 In a neonatal manikin study, the LMA Supreme was found to outperform the LMA Classic and LMA ProSeal.11 Compared with a newer second-generation device, the i-gel, the LMA Supreme was associated with higher first attempt success rates and faster times for successful insertion and had similar effectiveness in providing positive pressure ventilation.12
Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway versus Face Mask during Neonatal Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2015, Journal of PediatricsCitation Excerpt :The SLMA was superior to the classic LMA with regard to insertion time and oropharyngeal seal pressure24; a further advantage is gastric access. A previous neonatal manikin study confirmed these findings, including higher level of satisfaction expressed by users.25 The results of this study add that a neonatal SLMA (size 1) is effective and safe also when used in the context of neonatal resuscitation.
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.032.