Elsevier

Early Human Development

Volume 81, Issue 12, December 2005, Pages 965-972
Early Human Development

Withholding treatment, withdrawing treatment, and palliative care in the neonatal intensive care unit

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Advances in pharmacology and technology have sharply reduced mortality of extremely preterm infants at the expense of an increasing number of survivors with handicaps and disabilities. The EURONIC study among neonatal intensive care units across Europe demonstrates that treatment of infants born at the limits of viability raises challenging ethical, moral, legal, and emotional dilemmas among neonatologists, nurses, and parents alike. When is it wise to withhold or withdraw intensive care and, if so, what are the needs of the nonviable or dying infant, family, and neonatal staff to provide a humane and compassionate death? This process begins with a thorough determination of diagnosis and prognosis, followed by decision making on the basis of futility of treatment or quality-of-life issues, and counseling of parents. Withholding or withdrawing of intensive care should be synonymous with palliative care. Perinatal audit and after-care of the family complete the process. The Dutch viewpoint and practice guidelines on withholding and withdrawing of neonatal intensive care are presented.

Introduction

Advances in neonatal technology and pharmacology (antenatal corticosteroids and postnatal surfactant treatment) have sharply reduced mortality of extremely preterm infants at the expense of an increasing number of survivors with handicaps and disabilities [1]. At the same time, controversy has evolved over whether we are doing the right thing [2]. Is it worth it to institute intensive care at birth to infants at the threshold of viability and how do we face disastrous complications after the institution of intensive care? Although not initiating and withdrawing intensive care from infants born at the limits of viability has been practiced since the start of modern neonatology [2], it raises challenging ethical, moral, legal and emotional dilemmas. Who decides and on what basis? Ideally, life-or-death decisions on behalf of newborn infants are made by the medical team together with well-informed parents, but what should be done if the medical team considers the ultimate responsibility in end-of-life decisions too great a burden for parents to bear [3], [4] or parents do not concur with medical recommendations [4] or, worse, the court of law rules that parents have no right to refuse resuscitation of extremely preterm infants prior to birth because they cannot be fully evaluated until birth [5]? Do we base our decisions on experience with large groups of equally immature infants or on a fleeting assessment at the resuscitation table [5] and where are the data to support the predictive value of condition at birth for survival, much less long-term neurodevelopmental outcome [5]?

Withholding or withdrawing of intensive care for a newborn infant is one step in a process, which begins with a thorough determination of diagnosis and prognosis, followed by decision-making on the basis of futility of treatment or quality-of-life issues, counseling of parents, actual withholding or withdrawing of intensive care and palliative care, perinatal audit, and after-care of the family.

Section snippets

Outcome of extremely preterm infants

Ethical decisions on treatment options for extremely preterm infants should be based on evidence of expected outcome. Various studies published over the last 5 years have provided an impressive body of data on survival and short-term and long-term outcome of extremely preterm infants [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].

Ethical decision making in European NICUs: the EURONIC study group

The decision not to initiate or withdraw life-prolonging medical treatment based on an expected very poor prognosis for later life is taken by the treating physician after consultation with the medical and nursing staff and needs to be carried by this team (consensus) to be executed. Regulations and practices on withholding and withdrawing treatment in neonates vary widely across Europe. The members of the EURONIC (European Project on Parents' Information and Ethical Decision Making in Neonatal

Counseling of parents

The basic goal of counseling is that the physician informs the parents completely about the condition of their child and why the medical team chooses for withholding or withdrawing invasive treatment and makes sure the parents have understood the information.

Withholding/withdrawing intensive care and palliative care

Withholding or withdrawing intensive care at birth or in the NICU has been widely practiced for many years, but there is little information available on its results.

Perinatal audit

To assure quality of care and as part of obstetric and neonatal training programs, all perinatal deaths, complicated pregnancies and critically ill infants admitted to the NICU should be reviewed at regular perinatal meetings. In these meetings special attention should be paid to all aspects of care that may have affected outcome, the appropriateness and application of clinical guidelines, complications, and documentation of the ethical decision-making in the medical records.

After-care of the family

Support for parents and family in the months after the infant's death is essential. Follow-up support is provided by social workers, physicians, and nurses and includes repeated telephone contact, a conference with the family to review the medical events surrounding the infant's death and to evaluate the grieving response of the parents, and referral to perinatal loss support groups in the community.

Dutch point of view and withholding/withdrawing practice

In the Netherlands, neonatal intensive care is not routinely initiated in extremely preterm infants and intensive care is withdrawn if treatment is clearly futile. This policy is based on reports from the Dutch Medical Association and the Dutch Pediatric Association [30], which argue that withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in newborn infants with extremely poor prognoses is justifiable medical practice and that decisions should be taken by the medical and nursing team together

References (30)

  • K. Costeloe et al.

    The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability

    Pediatrics

    (2000)
  • P. Vanhaesebrouck et al.

    The EPIBEL study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for extremely preterm infants in Belgium

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • B. Larroque et al.

    Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2004)
  • J.F. Lucey et al.

    Fetal infants: the fate of 4172 infants with birth weights of 401 to 500 grams—the Vermont-Oxford Network experience (1996–2000)

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • M. Rijken et al.

    Mortality and neurologic, mental, and psychomotor development at 2 years in infants born less than 27 weeks' gestation: the Leiden follow-up project on prematurity

    Pediatrics

    (2003)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Palliative Care

      2023, Avery's Diseases of the Newborn
    • Understanding and addressing barriers to communication in the context of neonatal neurologic injury: Exploring the ouR-HOPE approach

      2019, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This should include providing parents and family with access to emotional and spiritual support from social workers, chaplains, and palliative care team members, as well as a child-life specialist to support the infant's siblings through the experience (Walther, 2005; National Association of Neonatal Nurses Board of Directors, 2015). Engaged clinical teams will help connect families to appropriate support services, such as perinatal loss support groups (Walther, 2005) and “a lactation consultant to assist mothers who want to breastfeed their infant or donate breast milk at the end of life and to help mothers manage cessation of lactation” (National Association of Neonatal Nurses Board of Directors, 2015). Clinical teams need to take responsibility for knowing if, how, and when to advocate for help that may or may not be medical in nature.

    • Palliative Care

      2018, Avery's Diseases of the Newborn: Tenth Edition
    • Palliative Care

      2017, Avery's Diseases of the Newborn, Tenth Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text