Pediatrics/original researchThe Effect of Family Presence on the Efficiency of Pediatric Trauma Resuscitations
Introduction
Family presence, introduced in the medical literature in 1987,1 is defined as “the attendance of family members in a location that affords visual or physical contact with the patient during invasive procedures or resuscitation.”2 Structured family presence programs provide written guidelines, education of staff, training for family support persons, and opportunity for feedback and evaluation. Family support for family presence is well documented.3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Organizational support includes the Emergency Nurses Association, American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians, and the American Heart Association.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 A statement supported by ACEP and the AAP recommends the option of family presence for all aspects of emergency care.13
Support for family presence is not universal. A survey of trauma surgeons concluded that family presence during all aspects of the trauma resuscitation was inappropriate.14 One concern raised is that family will distract the trauma team, increasing stress, resulting in performance problems that affect care or prolong a resuscitation.14 A survey of health care providers found that 15% believed that family presence was associated with longer resuscitation efforts.3 Most pediatric trauma does not require immediate operative intervention, and many patients have computed tomographic (CT) imaging performed after the initial resuscitation. Prolonged resuscitation may delay patient movement to CT scan, and we believed the time from arrival to CT scanning (CT time) would be a good measure of the efficiency of the resuscitation. Because not all patients require CT, we used resuscitation time (time to completion of all laboratory testing, emergency procedures, portable radiographs and secondary survey) as another measure of resuscitation efficiency. Resuscitation delays could affect patient outcomes and need to be studied before family presence policies are implemented. Studying pediatric patients is important because families are increasingly allowed to witness procedures in the emergency department (ED) and accompany children during transport. Extending family presence into the trauma area may be indicated if it does not affect patient care.
We sought to focus our investigation on trauma care provided during the initial evaluation in the ED. We hypothesized that family presence does not prolong the resuscitation for pediatric trauma patients. Our study objective was to compare pediatric trauma resuscitations with and without family presence and evaluate the effect of family presence on CT time and resuscitation time.
Section snippets
Study Design and Setting
This was a single-center, prospective trial in the ED at a freestanding American College of Surgeons Level 1 pediatric trauma center with an annual ED census of 45,000 pediatric patients. The institutional review board at the University of Utah approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from staff before study initiation. Informed consent was waived for trauma registry data. Family members offered family presence gave verbal consent before entering the trauma room,
Results
A total of 1,229 pediatric trauma activations occurred during the study period, 623 on even days and 606 on odd days for the intention-to-treat analysis (light grey shading, Figure 1). On even days, 8 children had family available but family presence was either not offered or declined, and many patients did not have available family. On odd days, family presence status could not be verified on some charts (99), and 68 families were offered family presence at parent request. Twenty-seven records
Limitations
Our study was not randomized or blinded, introducing bias in patient enrollment. Prestudy education and agreement by all services involved attempted to eliminate caregiver bias. Children with family presence in our protocol were, however, less severely injured than those without family presence. We believe this is largely due to their mode of transport. Unstable patients and those with more severe injuries are transported quickly; usually by helicopter.17 Parents may not accompany their child
Discussion
We designed our study to evaluate the effect of a new family presence program on the efficiency of pediatric trauma resuscitations. Our results demonstrate that resuscitation time and CT time for patients with and without family presence are similar, concluding that when family presence is offered in a structured program, there is no significant effect on the efficiency of the trauma resuscitation. A previously published study, by O'Connell et al,19 did not identify any differences in time to
References (22)
- et al.
Family participation during resuscitation: an option
Ann Emerg Med
(1987) - et al.
Do parents want to be present during invasive procedures performed on their children in the emergency department?a survey of 400 parents
Ann Emerg Med
(1999) - et al.
Effects of family presence during resuscitation and invasive procedures in a pediatric emergency department
J Emerg Nurs
(2006) - et al.
Evidence-based guidelines for family presence in the resuscitation room
Pediatr Emerg Care
(2007) - et al.
Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation
Am J Nurs
(2000) - et al.
Family presence during invasive procedures in the pediatric intensive care unit
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
(1999) - et al.
Family member presence during pediatric emergency department procedures
Pediatr Emerg Care
(1996) - Emergency Nurses Association. Presenting the option for family presence (1995 and 2001). The ENA position statement,...
- American College of Emergency Physicians. Patient- and family-centered care and the role of the emergency physician...
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Patient- and family-centered care and the role of the emergency physician providing...
Cited by (85)
Parental support needs during pediatric resuscitation: A systematic review
2022, International Emergency NursingPhysician well-being: Special considerations in pediatrics
2019, Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health CareCitation Excerpt :Strong partnership between parents and the health care team facilitate conditions that aid in healing and recovery of both the ill child and her entire family unit. There has been growing recognition of the importance of including parents in the health care team during advanced procedures, ranging from daily rounds to CPR.13-15 Increasingly, families of sick or injured children are viewed as an integral part of the care team, and interacting with family members can multiply the sense of satisfaction in the doctor-patient relationship.
Comparison the effect of trained and untrained family presence on their anxiety during invasive procedures in an emergency department: A randomized controlled trial
2019, Turkish Journal of Emergency MedicineClinical Practice Guideline: Family Presence
2019, Journal of Emergency NursingCurrent recommendations for paediatric resuscitation
2018, BJA EducationFamily presence during resuscitation: A concise narrative review
2017, Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
Supervising editors: Michael W. Shannon, MD; Steven M. Green, MD
Author contributions: NCD conceived the study. KLVW provided her knowledge of family presence and the literature to the creation of the family presence program. NCD, KWH, RAF, and ERS solicited the cooperation of staff and the hospital in this endeavor. NCD, KWH, and RAF designed the trial. NCD obtained research funding. KLVW created the education program for staff and educated family support persons and staff about family presence. NCD, KWH, and ERS supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. KWH managed the data and provided quality control for the trauma registry. RAF provided statistical advice and provided his knowledge of trauma scoring systems to the analysis and article. NCD and AED analyzed the data. AED reviewed the data analysis and performed the regression analysis. NCD drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. NCD takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Supported by a grant from the Primary Children's Medical Center Foundation.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Publication date: Available online November 14, 2008.