Determinants of blood pressure in very low birth weight neonates: lack of effect of antenatal steroids

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(00)00083-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives: To define the range of normal blood pressures (BP) for very low birth weight (VLBW;≤1500 g) neonates and to study perinatal variables affecting BP measurements after birth, including the effects of antenatal steroids. Study design: Antenatal steroids were rarely administered at Parkland Memorial Hospital before May 1994, permitting us to establish a cohort of VLBW neonates exposed to antenatal steroids [n=70, 1166±253 (S.D.) g, and 28.7±2.1 weeks] who were matched with neonates delivered during the prior year (n=46, 1100±241 g, 28.9±1.8 weeks). Maternal and neonatal charts were abstracted for pertinent data, and neonatal BP measurements (determined directly when an arterial catheter was available or indirectly by the oscillometric method) were extracted every 3 h for the first 12 h and every 6 h until 72 h postnatal. Results: Antenatal steroids did not affect BP immediately after birth or for the subsequent 72 h postnatal. Therefore, data from all neonates ≤1500 g were combined and the pattern of BP change over 72 h postnatal assessed. Systolic, diastolic and mean BP increased (P<0.001) 33%, 44% and 38%, respectively, during the first 72 h. Although neonates weighing ≤1000 g and 1001–1500 g demonstrated gradual increases (P<0.001) in systolic, diastolic and mean BP by 72 h, values were consistently lower (P<0.01) in neonates ≤1000 g. Of interest, only 11 neonates (9.5%) were treated for clinical hypotension. Conclusions: In VLBW neonates antenatal steroids do not modify BP measurements either immediately after birth or the 30–40% rise occurring in the first 72 h postnatal. Further, BP is developmentally regulated and is gestationally and birth weight dependent. These data provide additional insight into assessing the need for treating hypotension.

Introduction

Very low birth weight (VLBW, ≤1500 g) and very preterm (<32 week gestation) neonates are reported to have low arterial pressures after birth when compared to larger, more mature neonates [1], observations consistent with those reported in developing fetal animals studied across gestation [2]. However, it remains unclear what blood pressures (BP) in VLBW neonates should elicit concern on the part of the clinician and the institution of therapeutic interventions. This is important since ‘abnormalities’ of arterial pressure may be associated with increases in neonatal mortality and morbidity, including increases in the incidence and severity of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH; [3], [4], [5]) and periventricular leukomalacia [6]. On the other hand, inappropriate use of therapies to increase BP, e.g., volume expansion, may in themselves result in a rise in neonatal complications, including increased symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus, ICH, and mortality [7], [8], [9]. Therefore, it is obvious that consideration of normative values for BP in VLBW neonates during the first 72 h after birth is mandatory.

In the past 5 years there has been a dramatic increase in maternal glucocorticoid administration in the presence of expectant preterm delivery in order to facilitate fetal lung maturation. Prenatal glucocorticoid therapy also has been suggested to result in a lower incidence of neonatal hypotension [10], improved cardiovascular stability [11], a decreased need for pressor therapy [12], and higher mean arterial pressures in the first 72 h after birth [3]. These reports, however, have been confounded by an absence of appropriate definitions for stability and hypotension, the frequent use of volume expansion, and importantly, the consideration that improved lung function may also improve cardiovascular stability. Thus, it remains unclear if prenatal steroids improve cardiovascular function and stability.

To examine the effects of maternal glucocorticoid therapy on neonatal BP and to provide normative BP data in VLBW neonates, we examined BP during the first 72 h postnatal in a large population of totally in-born VLBW neonates delivered at Parkland Memorial Hospital. The unique aspect of this study was that before May 1st, 1994, antenatal steroids were rarely if ever used, whereas afterwards it became routine for pregnancies threatened by preterm delivery <34 week gestation in the absence of maternal hypertension and infection. Furthermore, there were minimal changes in neonatal care during this 2-year period, thus avoiding other variables. The purposes of this study, therefore, were to assess in VLBW neonates: (1) the effects of antenatal steroids on BP in the first 72 h after birth, (2) the role of other perinatal factors on BP during this time, especially birth weight and gestational age, and (3) the normal BP ranges in the first 72 h of life, when volume expanders and pressors are most likely to be used.

Section snippets

Study population

Neonates included in this study were born at Parkland Memorial Hospital, a large public hospital, between May 1st, 1993 and April 30th, 1995. All neonates with birth weight ≤1500 g were identified using a prospectively collected, computerized database that includes all births ≤2200 g, which has been in existence since 1977, and has been verified on several occasions [13], [14], [15]. Antenatal steroids were rarely administered to expectant preterm deliveries prior to May 1st, 1994. After that

Effects of antenatal steroids on neonatal blood pressure

The median number of doses of dexamethasone administered to mothers of Group I neonates was 3 (range 1–25), and the median interval between the final dose and delivery was 8.8 h (range 0.2–199.0 h). Comparing maternal characteristics for Groups I and II revealed that the use of pudendal anesthesia was greater in women with neonates in Group I (14 vs. 0%, P=0.02), while the use of local (10 vs. 27%, P=0.03) and epidural anesthesia (0 vs. 9%, P=0.04) were greater in women with neonates in Group

Discussion

Considerable controversy exists regarding the interpretation of BP measurements obtained in VLBW neonates, resulting in further uncertainty regarding which neonates have hypotension necessitating treatment. Normal BP values for term and preterm neonates were reported by Kitterman et al. 30 years ago [23]; however, only nine neonates with birth weights ≤1500 g were included and survival of VLBW neonates has increased substantially since then. Subsequent reports have expanded on these

References (47)

  • W.D. Engle et al.

    Diuresis and respiratory distress syndrome: Physiologic mechanisms and therapeutic implications

    J Pediatr

    (1983)
  • J.M. Perlman

    Antenatal glucocorticoid, magnesium exposure, and the prevention of brain injury of prematurity

    Sem Pediatr Neurol

    (1998)
  • A.E. Kopelman

    Blood pressure and cerebral ischemia in very low birth weight infants

    J Pediatr

    (1990)
  • M. Kluckow et al.

    Relationship between blood pressure and cardiac output in preterm infants requiring mechanical ventilation

    J Pediatr

    (1996)
  • A.B. Zubrow et al.

    Determinants of blood pressure in neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study

    J Perinatol

    (1995)
  • M.A. Heymann

    Fetal cardiovascular physiology

  • M.A. Kari et al.

    Prenatal dexamethasone treatment in conjunction with rescue therapy of human surfactant: a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study

    Pediatrics

    (1994)
  • G.S. Bada et al.

    Mean arterial blood pressure changes in premature neonates and those at risk for intraventricular hemorrhage

    J Pediatr

    (1990)
  • V.M. Miall-Allen et al.

    Mean arterial blood pressure and neonatal cerebral lesions

    Arch Dis Child

    (1987)
  • M. Offringa et al.

    Excess mortality in critically ill patients after treatment with human albumin

    Ned Tijdscr Geneeskd

    (1998)
  • Effect of antenatal dexamethasone administration on the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1981)
  • A.A. Moı̈se et al.

    Antenatal steroids are associated with less need for blood pressure support in extremely premature infants

    Pediatr

    (1995)
  • A.M. Sanchez et al.

    Systems approach to the evaluation of maternal and neonatal care

  • Cited by (38)

    • Neonatal Blood Pressure Standards: What Is “Normal”?

      2020, Clinics in Perinatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Arterial access and continuous BP monitoring should be considered in any patient with hemodynamic instability and a concerning BP.3–5 The impact of a wide range of antenatal treatments and conditions on neonatal BP values has been investigated, including medications, demographics, maternal conditions, perinatal factors, and fetal conditions (Table 1).31–56 Studies to date have been limited by the presence of confounding variables, small samples sizes, differential timing between the antenatal treatment or condition and the GA at birth, and study design.

    • Machine Learning to Support Hemodynamic Intervention in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

      2020, Clinics in Perinatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, although reference ranges of some vital signs have been established in large trials reflecting on clinical outcomes,5–9 others, such as mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate, are merely statistically derived z-scores based on population studies.10–12 Second, most of the vital parameters are dependent variables influenced by underlying physiologic processes, disease states, concomitant treatment, and (epi-)genetic predisposition,13–15 which are not always apparent to the clinician. Third, each physiologic parameter is analyzed independently and alarms are produced in a single dimension rather than using a multiparameter approach.

    • Cardiovascular compromise in the preterm infant during the first postnatal day

      2018, Hemodynamics and Cardiology: Neonatology Questions and Controversies
    • Fetal heart rate variation after corticosteroids for fetal maturation

      2017, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, there is no evidence that in human fetus blood pressure increases after corticosteroids. In a historic cohort comparison and in a study that randomized repeat corticosteroid doses with placebo a similar blood pressure in the newborns was observed between groups that were treated with antenatal corticosteroids and those that were not [16,17]. Thus, in the human fetus, the exact pathway that effects changes in cardiovascular parameters after treatment with corticosteroids, remains obscure.

    • Clinical Presentations of Neonatal Shock: The Very Low Birth Weight Neonate During the First Postnatal Day

      2012, Hemodynamics and Cardiology: Neonatology Questions and Controversies Expert Consult - Online and Print
    • Definition of Normal Blood Pressure Range: The Elusive Target

      2012, Hemodynamics and Cardiology: Neonatology Questions and Controversies Expert Consult - Online and Print
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text