CommentaryBeyond randomised versus observational studies
References (20)
- et al.
Ramdomized versus historical controls for clinical trials
Am J Med
(1982) Complexity and contradiction in clinical trial research
Am J Med
(1987)- et al.
Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?
Lancet
(2000) - et al.
Problems in the “evidence” of “evidence-based medicine”
Am J Med
(1997) - et al.
The risk of determining risk with multivariable models
Ann Intern Med
(1993) Can adult anthropometry be used as a ‘biomarker’ for prenatal and childhood exposures?
Int J Epidemiol
(2002)- et al.
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs
N Engl J Med
(2000) - et al.
A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials
N Engl J Med
(2000) - et al.
Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies
BMJ
(1999) - et al.
The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials
BMJ
(1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (120)
Randomized controlled trials and evidence-based policy: A multidisciplinary dialogue
2018, Social Science and MedicineRandomized trials and evidence in medicine: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
2018, Social Science and MedicineFrom Evidence Based Medicine to Medicine Based Evidence
2017, American Journal of MedicineDevelopment, Validation, and Assessment of an Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack-Specific Prediction Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
2017, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.