Elsevier

Clinics in Perinatology

Volume 28, Issue 4, December 2001, Pages 849-860
Clinics in Perinatology

Preterm premature rupture of the membranes before viability

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-5108(03)00082-4Get rights and content

Section snippets

DEFINITION

Preterm premature rupture of the membranes before viability represents the subset of PROM that occurs before fetal viability. The precise gestational age that defines viability varies somewhat by author, whether the reported series is nursery or delivery room based, and the year of publication. Currently, studies of VPPROM usually include patients with spontaneous or iatrogenic amniorrhexis at less than 25 weeks' gestational age. Studies reported over the past 15 years, however, have used up to

ETIOLOGY

There are no recent studies that have looked exclusively at the causes of VPPROM. An increasing body of literature has explored the apparent causes of PROM prior to term, however, and may ultimately lead to a better understanding of the cause and prevention of early onset PROM.

Urogenital infections have been most commonly implicated as a cause of PROM. This is especially true early in gestation. Various locations within the reproductive tract may become infected, leading to PROM.

NATURAL HISTORY

Perhaps the most important component in counseling patients with VPPROM is a full understanding of the natural history of this complication. Although there are several therapeutic modalities available that may improve outcome, the poor prognosis that usually attends this disorder must be carefully and completely reviewed.

Taylor and Garite17 reported one of the first series that looked at VPPROM (< 26 weeks). They reviewed the outcome of 53 cases managed expectantly. The mean gestational age at

IMPROVEMENTS IN NEONATAL OUTCOME

To understand better the risks and prognoses with VPPROM, it is important to recognize that neonatal care has markedly improved in the last decade, with better survival rates and more intact survivors, especially at early gestational ages. A series of neonatal technologic improvements, including use of exogenous pulmonary surfactant, better mechanical ventilation, and improved antibiotic regimens have improved the ability to save very small infants. Table 1, Table 2 demonstrate some of the

RECENT CHANGES IN OUTCOME

Over the past 10 years, several changes have begun to potentially influence outcome following VPPROM. Some perinatal centers have begun to use antenatal corticosteroids following PPROM to attempt to improve newborn lung function. Short-term tocolytic therapy is now frequently used, and maternal antibiotic regimens have also improved. Neonatal centers routinely use surfactant in both prophylactic and treatment regimens, and have modified and improved mechanical ventilation. The combination of

MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT

The diagnosis and management of VPPROM can contribute significantly to the overall expected outcome. It is not unusual for clinicians to mistake the symptoms of PROM early in gestation as symptoms of a vaginal infection. Failure to confirm the diagnosis can increase the risk of chorioamnionitis, and subsequent delivery. For that reason, a careful and consistent approach to the suspect patient as follows is warranted.

  • 1.

    VPPROM often does not present with the large gush of fluid per vagina as when

THE RISK OF RECURRENCE IN ANOTHER PREGNANCY

Premature rupture of the membranes alone is known to represent a risk factor for recurrent PROM in a subsequent pregnancy.5 There are no reports that specifically suggest that VPPROM itself has a unique recurrence risk. It is extremely rare, however, to observe the recurrence of VPPROM in the same patient.

Prevention of PPROM or VPPROM in a subsequent pregnancy is limited. Serial scans for confirmation of normal cervical length, cervical and vaginal cultures to allow treatment of bacterial

SUMMARY

Although relatively uncommon, VPPROM remains a devastating complication of pregnancy. Current management options offer some hope of improved survival, but morbidity and mortality remain high. Counseling the patient and family following this diagnosis is challenging, and often requires input from both perinatal and neonatal staff. For those patients choosing expectant management who then reach viability, tertiary care should be considered to improve survival risks.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (23)

  • TM Garite

    Premature rupture of the membranes

  • Cited by (29)

    • Amniopatch treatment for preterm premature rupture of membranes before 23 weeks' gestation and factors associated with its success

      2017, Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Rupture of fetal membranes before or at the limit of fetal viability, also known as ‘pre-viable’ preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), complicates about 1–4 in every thousand pregnancies [1,2].

    • Outcome of pregnancies with spontaneous PPROM before 24 + 0 weeks' gestation

      2016, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the incidence of PPROM before viability (<24 + 0 weeks) is much lower. Only about 5 in 1000 women are affected by this condition [1,2]. When it does occur, however, the clinical consequences are much worse than with PPROM at a later gestational age.

    • Neonatal and two-year outcomes after rupture of membranes before 25 weeks of gestation

      2013, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Extremely preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a rare event which complicates less than 1% of pregnancies, but is a major cause of foetal loss and extreme preterm birth [1,2].

    • Previable rupture of membranes: Effect of amniotic fluid on pregnancy outcome

      2008, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Extremely preterm premature rupture of membranes before 24 weeks (EPPROM) occurs in less than 1% of pregnancies [1].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text