Original article
Ambulatory care of febrile infants younger than 2 months of age classified as being at low risk for having serious bacterial infections

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(88)80312-3Get rights and content

We prospectively examined whether febrile infants younger than 2 months of age who were defined as being at low risk for having bacterial infection could be observed as outpatients without the usual complete evaluation for sepsis and without antibiotic treatment. A total of 237 previously healthy febrile infants were seen at the Pediatric Emergency Room over 17 1/2 months. One hundred forty-eight infants (63%) fulfilled the criteria for being at low risk: no physical findings consisting of soft tissue or skeletal infections, no purulent otitis media, normal urinalysis, <25 white blood cells per high-power field on microscopic stool examination, peripheral leukocyte count 5000 to 15,000/mm3 with <1500 band cells/mm3. One infant appeared too ill to be included, and had sepsis and meningitis. None of the 148 infants at low risk had bacterial infections, versus 21 of 88 (24%) of those at high risk (P<0.0001); eight of 88 (9%) had bacteremia. Of the 148 infants classified as being at low risk for having bacterial infection, 62 (42%) were discharged to home, and 72 (49%) were initially observed for ≤24 hours and then discharged. Seventeen infants (11%) were hospitalized: in six, low risk became high risk; six had indications other than fever; and five because the study physicians could not be found. The 137 nontreated infants were closely observed as outpatients. The duration of fever was <48 hours in 42%, and less than 96 hours in 91%. All infants were observed for at least 10 days after the last examination. The fever resolved spontaneously in all infants but two, with otitis media, who were treated as outpatients. Our data suggest that management of fever in selected young infants as outpatients is feasible if meticulous follow-up is provided.

References (34)

  • NyhanW et al.

    Septicemia of the newborn

    Pediatrics

    (1958)
  • McCarthyP et al.

    The serious implications of high fever in infants during their first three months: six years' experience at the Yale—New Haven Hospital Emergency Room

    Clin Pediatr

    (1976)
  • GregoryJ et al.

    Blood neutrophil response to bacterial infection in the first month of life

    Arch Dis Child

    (1972)
  • CaspeWB et al.

    The evaluation and treatment of the febrile infant

    Pediatr Infect Dis

    (1983)
  • SmithAL

    The febrile infant

    Pediatr Rev

    (1979)
  • RobertsKB et al.

    Fever in the first eight weeks of life

    John Hopkins Med J

    (1977)
  • BerkowitzCD et al.

    Fever in infants less than two months of age: spectrum of disease and predictors of outcome

    Pediatr Emerg Care

    (1985)
  • Cited by (155)

    • Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Febrile Infants: Challenging Tradition

      2018, Advances in Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Subsequently, groups of investigators in large cities (Rochester, Boston, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Milwaukee) considered an alternative strategy to the attempt to identify infants who required antimicrobial therapy: Identify those who did not. ( They developed and experimented with clinical decision models that included diagnostic laboratory tests in an effort to distinguish infants at low risk from those at high risk for SBI [3–10].) SBI always included UTI, bacteremia, and bacterial meningitis.

    • Fever Without Localizing Signs

      2018, Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text