Use of physical and neurologic observations in assessment of gestational age in low birth weight infants*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80416-XGet rights and content

The relative validities of three clinical assessment methods for estimatinggestational age in newborn low birth weight infants were evaluated with reference to estimates based on the date of the mother's last menstrual period. For 1246 infants in eight diverse institutions, estimates based on physical criteria correlated more strongly with dates estimates, ylelded estimates more similar on average to dates estimates, and yielded higher proportions of correct classifications of prematurity and small for gestational age than did estimates based on neurologic criteria or neurologic and physical criteria combined. These results support the use of physical criteria rather than neurologic or combined criteria for the clinical assessment of gestational age in low birth weight infants. In a subsample of 511 black and white infants, there were no ethnic differences in mean error of estimate for any of the three methods.

References (22)

  • Saint-Anne DargassiesS

    La maturation neurologique du premature

    Etudes Neonat

    (1955)
  • Cited by (74)

    • Maternal preconceptional weight and gestational length

      2005, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Volumetric analysis of regional cerebral development in preterm children

      2004, Pediatric Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      All infants were examined with serial cranial ultrasonography beginning at the sixth postnatal hour and continuing through the expected obstetric due date; the grading systems for intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, and ventriculomegaly are described elsewhere [16]. Prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal data were obtained prospectively by maternal interviews and from chart review, and all infants underwent gestation age assessment on the first postnatal day [17]. Cognitive assessments were performed by research staff blinded to the child's study group and medical status.

    • Improving the assessment of gestational age in a Zimbabwean population

      2002, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and by theDivision of Maternal and Child Health, U.S. Public Health Service, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the Pew Trusts.

    View full text