International perspectives on treatment choice in neonatal intensive care units

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90218-HGet rights and content

Abstract

Over the past 25 years, neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have been established throughout the industrialized world and in some Third World nations to provide sophisticated medical interventions for critically ill newborns. This paper discusses the four major factors affecting treatment choices for newborns with disabilities or at risk for disabilities: the availability of resources, societal attitudes toward medical interventions and life with disabilities, the roles of physicians, parents and other decision-makers, and the role of the law. Much has been written on the bioethical issues surrounding such treatment as it is practiced in the United States, including analysis by social scientists; however, little has been written on how those issues are perceived and dealt with in most other nations, and very little comparative research has been conducted. The author provides an international perspective on the bioethical issues involved by comparing U.S. practice, which has received much attention, with a generalized commentary on practices in other parts of the world, which have received less examination. The nations surveyed include Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, China, France, India, Israel, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, and West Germany. The value of further comparative research is discussed in order to encourage others to do such research.

References (108)

  • A.L. Caplan

    Imperiled newborns. Special issue

    Hastings Cent. Rep.

    (1987)
  • J.H. Guillemin et al.

    Mixed Blessings: Intensive Care for Newborns

    (1986)
  • Anspach R. R. Life-and-death Decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care: A Study in the Sociology of Knowledge. University of...
  • B.W. Levin

    Caring choices: Decision making about treatment for catastrophically ill newborns

  • R. Weir

    Selective Nontreatment of Handicapped Newborns

    (1984)
  • N.K. Rhoden

    Treating Baby Doe: the ethics of uncertainty

    Hastings Cent. Rep.

    (1986)
  • J.E. Magnet et al.

    Withholding Treatment from Defective Newborn Children

    (1985)
  • E.W.D. Young

    Societal Provision for the Long-term Needs of the Disabled in Britain and Sweden Relative to Decision-making in Newborn Intensive Care Units

  • P. Budetti et al.

    Case study No. 10

  • Unpublished Statistics from Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center,...
  • M.C. McCormick

    The contribution of low birthweight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1985)
  • S. Shapiro

    Changes in infant morbidity associated with decrease in neonatal mortality

    Pediatrics

    (1983)
  • J. Lorber

    Early results of selective treatment of spina bifida cystica

    Br. med. J.

    (1973)
  • R.S. Duff et al.

    Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special care nursery

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1973)
  • R.H. Gross et al.

    Early management and decision making for the treatment of myelomeningocele

    Pediatrics

    (1983)
  • S.C. Ragatz et al.

    Decisions to withdraw life support in the neonatal intensive care unit

    Clin. Pediat.

    (1983)
  • A.G.M. Campbell

    Which infants should not receive intensive care?

    Archs Dis. Child.

    (1982)
  • A.G.M. Campbell et al.

    Treatment dillemas in neonatal care: Who should survive and who should decide? in a symposium report: Biomedical ethics: An Anglo-American dialogue

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1988)
  • Institute of Medicine

    Preventing Low Birthweight

    (1985)
  • B.W. Levin

    The cultural context of decision making for catastrophically ill newborns: the case of Baby Jane Doe

  • V. Sidel et al.

    Health and medical care in the United States

  • W.H. Kitchen

    Provision of perinatal services and survival of extremely low birthweight infants in Victoria

    Med. J. Aust.

    (1983)
  • V.D. Gmyrek et al.

    Das sehr untergewichtige Neugeborene (<1500 g): Dedeutung, strategie, untere Grenze, ethische Probleme, Betreuung

    Kinderarztl Praxix

    (1987)
  • F. Beaufils

    Néonatologie et reanimation pédiatrique: des acquis menacé

    Arch. Fr. Pediatr.

    (1983)
    O.de Bethmann

    Analyse des resultants a moyen terme de la prise en charge des 151 enfants ≤ 1500 g admis a l”Usinn de Port-Royal en 1981

    Prog. Neonat.

    (1983)
  • R.L. Lam

    Priority in special care nurseries in Malaysia

    Med. J. Malaysia

    (1983)
  • R.H. Musoke

    Admissions to Mulago hospital special care baby unit (SCU) 1971–1975. A retrospective study

    E. Afr. med. J.

    (1983)
  • L.S. James

    Neonatology in China

    (1983)
  • John E., Lee K. amd Li G. M. Costs of neonatal intensive care. Aust. Paediat. J. 19,...M. Monset-Couchard

    Dout de la prise en charge des 151 nouveau-nes de poids ≤ 1500 g admis a l'usinn de Port-Royal en 1981

    Prog. Neonat.

    (1983)
  • J.J. Pomerance

    Costs of living for infants weighing 1000 grams or less at birth

    Pediatrics

    (1978)
  • N.K. Rhoden

    Presentation to the Hastings Center research group on care of the imperiled newborn

    (1985)
  • Guttmacher S. Personal communication. New York,...
  • K.N.S. Subramanian

    Neonatal Care of India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. Presentation

    (1985)
  • C. Subramanian et al.

    Intensive care for high risk infants in Calcutta

    Am. J. Dis. Child.

    (1986)
  • S.R. Daga

    Mortality in infants discharged from N.I.C.U.

    Ind. Pediat.

    (1984)
  • Herman A. Personal communication. New York City,...
  • Poll backs “right to die” ruling

    New York Times

    (1985)
  • Survey shows split on issue of treating deformed infants

    New York Times

    (1983)
  • B.W. Levin

    Consensus and controversy in the treatment of catastrophically ill newborns: report of a survey

  • Cited by (39)

    • Intensive care medicine and newborn infants

      2003, Revista de Calidad Asistencial
    • End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: Physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countries

      2000, Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most have concerned the English-speaking countries4–9 or the Netherlands, where the debate that led to non-prosecution of euthanasia for competent adults has been parallelled by similar reasoning about neonatal decision-making.10,11 Data allowing comparison and contrast for different countries and cultures are particularly scarce.12 Therefore, ethical and legal discussions and formulations take place with scant knowledge of the actual behaviours they intend to guide.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text