Research reportUniversal screening for infant hearing impairment: simple, beneficial, and presently justified
References (28)
- et al.
Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(1994) - et al.
An evaluation of BERA for hearing screening in high-risk neonates
Laryngoscope
(1983) Audiologic screening of newborn infants who are at-risk for hearing impairment
Asha
(1989)- et al.
Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: not simple, not risk-free, not necessarily beneficial and not presently justified
Pediatrics
(1994) - et al.
Screening for auditory dysfunction in infants by evoked otoacoustic emissions
Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
(1988) - et al.
Early identification of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment
Hear. J.
(1987) - et al.
Audiometric accuracy of the click ABR in infants at risk for hearing loss
J. Am. Acad. Aud.
(1990) - et al.
Implementing a statewide system of services for infants and toddlers with hearing disabilities
- et al.
Lowering the age of identification: Oregon's design and preliminary results
Volta Rev.
(1993) - et al.
Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn
Arch. Dis. Child.
(1991)
Model program V: a high-risk register by computerized search of birth certificates
The ups and “Downs” of high-risk hearing screening: the Utah statewide program
The impact of a child's hearing impairment on the family: a parent's perspective
The effectiveness of screening programs based on high-risk characteristics in early identification of hearing impairment
Ear Hear.
Cited by (69)
Universal newborn hearing screening in Umbria region, Italy
2016, International Journal of Pediatric OtorhinolaryngologyCitation Excerpt :The coverage rate did not improve over the 2.5 years from its implementation in the WB population, while a progressive increase in the percentage of newborns examined (100% in 2011 and 2012) was observed in the BRF infants. Moreover, the rate of false-positive results after stage 1 screening is consistent with findings in other reports and indicates that it is sufficiently specific for universal screening [21]. For both WB and BRF infants, the percentage of missing data during the subsequent stages of screening was still high compared with the recommended values and did not satisfy the criteria established in the program with negative effects on the number of subjects to be reexamined.
Screening, rubella vaccination, and childhood hearing impairment in Taiwan
2014, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesThe cost-effectiveness of universal newborn screening for bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment: Systematic review
2012, Academic PediatricsCitation Excerpt :Of the 2 type B evaluations that examined different approaches to risk factor screening, only one clearly screened for bilateral hearing impairment.34 The 7 type B studies18,34–45 that compared UNHS to risk factor screening used different diagnostic criteria and approaches to screening. The primary measure of cost-effectiveness was the cost per case detected within a set time period, either explicitly defined as six months of age, or implicitly as the period of time taken until diagnosis.
Prevalence of mutations located at the dfnb1 locus in a population of cochlear implanted children in eastern Romania
2012, International Journal of Pediatric OtorhinolaryngologyThe Evolution of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs in the United States
2010, Seminars in PerinatologyPediatric Communication Disorders
2007, Pediatric Otolaryngology: Requisites in Pediatrics