Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 342, Issue 8865, 24 July 1993, Pages 193-198
The Lancet

Articles
The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units

https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92296-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Assessment of different hospitals' performance in neonatal intensive care has tended to rely on risk of mortality adjusted only for birthweight. We have developed a neonatal scoring system, CRIB (clinical risk index for babies), to take account of other factors. Scores are given for birthweight, gestational age, maximum and minimum fraction of inspired oxygen and maximum base excess during the first 12 h, and presence of congenital malformations. CRIB was developed retrospectively in a cohort of 812 infants of birthweight 1500 g or less or gestational age less than 31 weeks treated in four UK tertiary hospitals between 1988 and 1990. The scoring system was then validated by comparing its value as a predictor of hospital death with that of birthweight in a separate cohort of 488 similar infants. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting death in this validation cohort (a measure of the predictor's accuracy) was significantly greater for CRIB than for birthweight alone (0·90 [SE 0·05] vs 0·78 [0·03], p=0·03). Both indices of initial risk were used to assess the performance of nine tertiary and four non-tertiary hospitals in the UK. We looked at hospital mortality among the 1300 infants in the development and validation cohorts plus 248 other infants of birthweight 1500 g or less or gestational age less than 31 weeks. Without adjustment for initial risk, there was no clear difference in group mortality between the tertiary and non-tertiary hospitals. However, calculation of risk- adjusted mortality by means of CRIB showed that babies were twice as likely to die in the non-tertiary hospitals as in the tertiary hospitals (odds ratio 2·12 [95% Cl 1·39-3·24]). Adjustment for birthweight alone also showed higher odds of death in non-tertiary hospitals (1·45 [1·01-2·11]). CRIB is a robust index of initial neonatal risk that is more accurate than birthweight and simple enough for routine use. International comparisons of staffing policy and organisation of neonatal intensive care units are needed to investigate the reasons for variations in performance.

References (29)

  • S. Greenland et al.

    The case control method in medical care evaluation

    Med Care

    (1981)
  • Wo Tarnow-Mordi et al.

    Predicting death from initial disease severity: a method for comparing the performance of neonatal units

    BMJ

    (1990)
  • D. Field et al.

    Survival and place of treatment after premature delivery

    Arch Dis Child

    (1991)
  • N. Paneth et al.

    Newborn intensive care and neonatal mortality in low-birth-weight infants: a population study

    N Engl J Med

    (1982)
  • Cited by (789)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    CRIB Investigators' Group and writing committee F Cockburn, R W I Cooke, H R Gamsu, A Greenough, A Hopkins, N McIntosh, S A Ogstont, G J Parry, M Silverman, J C L Shaw, W O Tarnow-Mordi, A R Wilkinson

    2

    Correspondence to: Dr William Tarnow-Mordi, Department of Child Health, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK

    View full text