Do tocolytic agents stop preterm labor? A critical and comprehensive review of efficacy and safety

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(93)90376-TGet rights and content

Objective: Our aim was to determine the efficacy and safety of tocolytic agents currently used to treat premature labor.

Study Design: We carried out a comprehensive review of tocolytic agents in the treatment of premature labor. Three hundred twenty-eight studies published between 1933 and 1992 were analyzed.

Results: An analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials showed that magnesium sulfate is not better than placebo in the treatment of premature labor. R-Adrenergic receptor agonists effectively stop premature labor for only 24 to 48 hours. Calcium channel blockers and oxytocin antagonists inhibit uterine contractions, but their role in stopping labor is undefined. Prostaglandin inhibitors appear to be effective in treating premature labor and have few adverse side effects.

Conclusions: The only tocolytic drugs that might be effective are the prostaglandin inhibitors. Tocolytic agents should be used only between 24 and 32 completed weeks of gestation. Magnesium sulfate should not be used to treat premature labor. Oxytocin antagonists should be used only in experimental clinical trials. Calcium channel blockers and p-adrenergic receptor agonists inhibit uterine contractions but do not prolong gestation for longer than 48 hours.

References (49)

  • DI Hollander et al.

    Magnesium sulfate and ritodrine hydrochloride: a randomized comparison

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1987)
  • JR Niebyl et al.

    The inhibition of premature labor with indomethacin

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1980)
  • RB Lewis et al.

    Influence of acetylsalicylic acid, an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis, on the duration of human gestation and labour

    Lancet

    (1973)
  • O Gamissans et al.

    A study of indomethacin combined with ritodrine in threatened preterm labor

    Fur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

    (1978)
  • Z Katz et al.

    Treatment of premature labor contractions with combined ritodrine and indomethacin

    Int J Gynaecol Obstet

    (1983)
  • R Besinger et al.

    Randomized comparative trial of indomethacin and ritodrine for the long-term treatment of preterm labor

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1991)
  • JE Ferguson et al.

    A comparison of tocolysis with nifedipine or ritodrine: analysis of efficacy and maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcome

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1990)
  • O Castren et al.

    Treatment of imminent premature labour

    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand

    (1975)
  • M Wynn et al.

    The prevention of preterm birth. London: Foundation for Education and Research in ChildBearing

    (1977)
  • M O'Driscoll

    Discussion

  • A Wesselius-De Casparis et al.

    Results of double-blind, multicentre study with ritodrine in premature labour

    BMJ

    (1971)
  • GS Adam

    Isoxsuprine and premature labour

    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1966)
  • R Das

    Isoxsuprine in premature labour

    J Obstet Gynaecol India

    (1969)
  • R Sivasamboo

    Premature labour

  • Cited by (232)

    • Endocrine Diseases of Pregnancy

      2019, Yen & Jaffe's Reproductive Endocrinology: Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management: Eighth Edition
    • Magnesium Sulfate: Another Cause of a Solute Diuresis

      2017, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
    • Parameters extraction and monitoring in uterine EMG signals. Detection of preterm deliveries

      2013, IRBM
      Citation Excerpt :

      The socio-economic consequences of these prematurity are important [2]. Indeed, some days more in utero can improve the maturation of the fetus and hence its viability at birth [3]. For this, we need a reliable method for the early detection and prevention of preterm birth threats.

    • Endocrine Diseases of Pregnancy

      2013, Yen and Jaffe's Reproductive Endocrinology: Seventh Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Panel presentation, presented by invitation at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society, Hot Springs, Virginia, September 10-12, 1992.

    View full text