Abstract
Objective
To develop a clinical strategy for detection of Congenital heart disease (CHD) in the newborn through a combination of clinical signs and pulse oximetry.
Design
Prospective longitudinal study.
Setting
Community level hospital in the city of Kochi, Kerala.
Participants and interventions
All consecutive newborns between June 2006 and February 2009 were prospectively screened for CHD, 48 hours after birth. The on-site pediatrician performed clinical screening. A study nurse recorded pulse oximetry in a lower extremity; value of <94% was defined as abnormal. Echocardiography was performed on site by a trained research officer. A 6-week clinical follow-up evaluation was done for all.
Main outcome measure
Detection of CHD by echocardiography.
Results
Of 5487 babies screened, 425 (7.75%) had CHD. 17 (0.31%) had major CHD, two of whom (one ALCAPA and one large VSD) were missed during the initial evaluation. The rest were minor CHD (408 patients, 7.44%), most of which normalized by 6 weeks. On multivariate analysis, murmur, central cyanosis, abnormal precordial pulsations and abnormal pulse oximetry emerged as significant predictors of CHD. The sensitivity of clinical evaluation and pulse oximetry combined was 19% for all CHDs and 20% for major CHD; specificity was 88%.
Conclusions
In the community setting of a developing country, clinical evaluation and pulse oximetry after birth had a very low sensitivity for detection of CHD. Though an abnormal screening warrants prompt echocardiography, a 6-week clinical evaluation is recommended to ensure that major CHD is not missed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Harb M, Hey E, Wren C. Death in infancy from unrecognized congenital heart disease. Arch Dis Child. 1994;71:3–7.
Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. JACC. 2002;39:1890–1900.
Wren C, Reinhardt Z, Khawaja K. Twenty-year trends in diagnosis of life-threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F33–F35.
Richmond S, Wren C. Early diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Semin Neonatol. 2001;6:27–35.
Keuhl KS, Loffredo CA, Ferencz C. Failure to diagnose congenital heart disease in infancy. Pediatrics. 1999;103:743–747.
Meberg A, Otterstad JE, Froland G, Hals J, Sorland SJ. Early clinical screening of neonates for congenital heart disease: the cases we miss. Cardiology Young. 1999;9:169–174.
Lee TW, Skelton RE, Skene C. Routine neonatal examination: Effectiveness of trainee pediatrician compared with advanced neonatal nurse practitioner. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;85:F100–F104.
Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L. Presentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: implications for routine examination. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80:F49–F53.
Ainsworth SB, Wyllie JP, Wren C. Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiac murmurs in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80:F43–F45.
Arlettaz R, Archer N, Wilkinson AR. Natural history of innocent heart murmurs in newborn babies: controlled echocardiographic study. Arch Dis Child. 1998;78:F166–F170.
Koppel RI, Druschel CM, Carter T, Goldberg BE, Mehta PN, Talwar R, et al. Effectiveness of pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns. Pediatrics. 2003;111:451–455.
Reich JD, Miller S, Brogdon B, Casatelli J, Gomph T, Huhta JC, et al. The use of pulse oximetry to detect congenital heart disease. J Pediatr. 2003;142:268–272.
Richmond S, Reay G, Abu-Harb M. Routine pulse oximetry in the asymptomatic newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;87:F83–88.
Hoke TR, Donohue PK, Bawa PK, Mitchell RD, Pathak A, Rowe PC, et al. Oxygen saturation as a screening test for critical congenital heart disease: A preliminary study. Pediatr Cardiol. 2002;23:403–409.
Meberg A, Brugmann-Pieper S, Due R Jr, Eskedal L, Fageru I, Farstad T, et al. First day of life pulse oximetry screening to detect congenital heart defects. J Pediatr. 2008;152:761–765.
Bakr AF, Habib HS. Combining pulse oximetry and clinical examination in screening for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2005;26:832–835.
Arlettaz R, Bauschatz AS, Monkoff M, Essers B, Bauersfeld U. The contribution of pulse oximetry for early diagnosis of congenital heart disease in newborns. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:94–98.
Singh M. Care of the Newborn. 5th Edition. New Delhi: Sagar Publications; 2004.
Kumar RK, Shrivastava S. Pediatric heart care in India. Heart. 2008;94:984–990.
Bakshi KD, Vaidyanathan B, Sundaram KR, Roth SJ, Shivaprakasha K, Rao SG, et al. Determinants of early outcome after neonatal heart surgery in a developing country. J Thoracic Cardio Vascular Surgery. 2007;134:765–771.
Reich JD, Connolly B, Bradley G, Litman S, Koeppel W, Lewycky P. Reliability of a single pulse oximetry reading as a screening test for congenital heart disease in otherwise asymptomatic newborn infants: The importance of human factors. Pediatr Cardiol. 2008;29:371–376.
Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP, Smith FC, Hoke TR, Koppel R, et al. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2009;120:447–448.
Evans N. Echocardiography on neonatal intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. J Paediatr Child Health. 2000;36:169–171.
Katumba-Lunyenya JL. Neonatal/infant echocardiography by the non-cardiologist: a personal practice, past, present, and future. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;86:F55–F57.
Skinner JR. Echocardiography on the neonatal unit: a job for the neonatologist or cardiologist. Arch Dis Child 1998;78:401–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaidyanathan, B., Sathish, G., Mohanan, S.T. et al. Clinical screening for congenital heart disease at birth: A prospective study in a community hospital in Kerala. Indian Pediatr 48, 25–30 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0021-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0021-1