Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research without Consent: Exception from and Waiver of Informed Consent in Resuscitation Research

  • Origianl Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ethical concept of Informed Consent provides individuals with the right and the opportunity to approve of events that will occur regarding his or her own person. In medicine, informed consent is obtained for treatment and for research participation. However, under some circumstances, prospective informed consent cannot be obtained because of the devastating clinical condition of the patient. In emergency circumstances, treatment is never withheld if obtaining informed consent from a critically ill person is not possible or if a delay while seeking surrogates would further endanger life. In emergency research circumstances, waiving informed consent for study participation is fraught with additional ethical considerations. This article will review a presentation given at the June 2, 2006 conference entitled “The Ethics of Research in Emergency Medicine”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 21 CFR 50.24 and 45 CFR 46.101(i) (1996). Protection of human subjects; informed consent, and waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research; final rules. Federal Register. 61 (192, Oct 2): 51498–51533.

  2. Waiver of Informed Consent Requirements in Certain Emergency Research Circumstances DHHS Regulations (45CFR Part 46): Informed Consent Requirements in Emergency Research; OPRR Reports: October 31, 1996, 97–101.

  3. Office of Science, Technology Policy. (1991). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Federal Register, 56, 28002–28032.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 21 CFR 50 (1991). Protection of Human Subjects (Informed Consent Requirements, FDA).

  5. Prentice, E. D., Antonson, D. L., Leibrock, L. G., Prabhu, V. C., Kelso, T. K., & Sears, T. D. (1993). IRB review of a Phase II randomized clinical trial involving incompetent patients suffering from severe closed head injury. IRB, 15(5), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prentice, E. D., Antonson, D. L., Leibrock, L. G., Kelso, T. K., & Sears, T. D. (1994). An update on the PEG-SOD study involving incompetent subjects: FDA permits an exception to informed consent requirements. IRB, 16(1,2), 16–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrahamson, N. S., Meisel, A., & Safar, P. (1986). Deferred Consent: A New Approach for Resuscitation Research on Comatose Patients. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 255, 2466–2471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis, G. B. (1993) “Dear Colleague” Letter. Human Subjects Protection. OPRR Reports. August 12, 1993; No 93–3.

  9. Biros, M. H. (1996). Development of the Multi-organizational Document Regarding Emergency Ressearch Consent. Academic Emergency Medicine, 3(2), 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biros, M. H., Lewis, R. J., Olson, C. M., Runge, J. W., Cummins, R. O., & Frost, N. (1995). Informed Consent in Emergency Research. Consensus Statement from the Coalition Conference of Acute Resuscitation and Critical Care Researchers. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1283–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical, Behavorial Research (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. OPRR Publication, Washington, DC., 887–806.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baren, J. M., Anicetti, J. P., Ledesma, S., Biros, M. H., Mahabee-Gittens, M., & Lewis, R. J. (1999). An Initial Approach to Community Consultation Prior to Initiating and Emergency Research Study Incorporating a Waiver of Informed Consent. Academic Emergency Medicine, 6(12), 1210–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biros, M. H., Fish, S. S., & Lewis, R. J. (1999). Implementing the Food and Drug Administration’s Final Rule for Waiver of Informed Consent in Certain Emergency Research Circumstances. Academic Emergency Medicine, 6(12), 1272–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, MC-825, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, 701 Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55408, USA

    Michelle H. Biros

Authors
  1. Michelle H. Biros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle H. Biros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biros, M.H. Research without Consent: Exception from and Waiver of Informed Consent in Resuscitation Research. Sci Eng Ethics 13, 361–369 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9020-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9020-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation