Skip to main content
Log in

Nurses’ reactions to alarms in a neonatal intensive care unit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), like other intensive care units, are intended to provide immediate responses to any change in the patient’s condition. Patient-monitoring alarms and alarms from other medical equipment are very common in these units, and most alarms have no clinical significance. This study addresses the question of how alarms affect nurses’ actions by measuring the occurrence of alarms from different causes in a NICU, recording the nurses’ reactions, and analyzing the relationship between the alarms and the actions. The results show that nurses often do not respond directly to alarms, but, rather, use them as additional sources of information in their ongoing flow of actions. The probabilities for their responding to an alarm depend on the causes of the alarm, its duration, and the characteristics of the patient. These findings support the view that experienced nurses dynamically adjust their activities according to the information they receive from alarm systems and other sources, and that they combine their reactive actions with the periodic performance of routine tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bliss J, Gilson R, Deaton J (1995) Human probability matching behaviour in response to alarms of varying reliability. Ergonomics 38:2300–2312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz S (1983) Cry-wolf: the psychology of false alarms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

  • Cropp AJ, Woods LA, Raney D, Bredle DL (1994) Name that tone—the proliferation of alarms in the intensive care unit. Chest 105:1217–1220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel WW (1999) Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. Wiley, New York

  • Gaba DM, Lee T (1990) Measuring the workload of the anesthesiologist. Anesth Analg 71:354–361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerald W, Grumet MD (1993) Sounding board. N Engl J Med 328:433–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Getty DJ, Swets JA, Pickett RM, Gonthier D (1995) System operator response to warnings of danger: a laboratory investigation of the effects of the predictive value of a warning on human response time. J Exp Psychol Appl 1:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay D, Oken D (1972) The psychological stresses of intensive care unit nursing. Psychosom Med 34:109–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JH, Hayes B (1983) An “alarming” situation in the intensive therapy unit. Intensive Care Med 9:103–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kestin IG, Miller BR, Lockhart CH (1988) Auditory alarms during anesthesia monitoring. Anesthesiology 69(1):106–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kragt H, Bonten J (1983) Evaluation of a conventional process alarm system in a fertilizer plant. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-13:589–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless ST (1994) Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 22:981–985

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith C, Edworthy J (1994) Sources of confusion in intensive therapy unit alarms. In: Stanton N (ed) Human factors in alarm design. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 207–219

  • Meredith C, Edworthy J (1995) Are there too many alarms in the intensive care unit? An overview of the problems. J Adv Nurs 21:15–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Bitan Y, Shinar D, Zmora E (1999) Scheduling of actions and reliance on warnings in a simulated control task. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43rd annual meeting, Houston, Texas, September/October 1999. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, California, pp 251–255

  • Momtahan K, Hetu R, Tansley B (1993) Audibility and identification of auditory alarms in operating room and intensive care unit. Ergonomics 36:1159–1176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RW, Montano SR (1996) Response times to visual and auditory alarms during anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 24:682–684

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Carroll TM (1986) Survey of alarms in an intensive therapy unit. Anaesthesia 41:742–744

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Factors 39:230–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabar R, Zmora E (1997) Nurses’ response to alarms from monitoring systems in NICU. Pediatr Res 41:1027

    Google Scholar 

  • Seagull FJ, Sanderson PM (1998) Anesthesia alarms in surgical context. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42nd annual meeting, Chicago, Illinois, October 1998. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 1048–1052

  • Sorkin RD (1988) Why are people turning off our alarms? J Acoust Soc Am 84:1107–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton NA, Harrison DJ, Taylor- Burge KL, Porter LJ (2000) Sorting the wheat from the chaff: a study of the detection of alarms. Cogn Technol Work 2:134–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsien CL, Fackler JC (1997) Poor prognosis for existing monitors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 25:614–619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund ME, Hoffman LR (1988) When electronic devices outnumber flower bouquets in the hospital room. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 32nd annual meeting, Anaheim, California, October 1988. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 430–434

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partly funded by a grant from the Israel Ministry of Health. We thank Mirit Shomer, Ayelet Yakubovish, Dror Ben-Yakar, and Idit Catz for their help in data collection in the NICU. Parts of this study were presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Diego, CA, August 2000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Meyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bitan, Y., Meyer, J., Shinar, D. et al. Nurses’ reactions to alarms in a neonatal intensive care unit. Cogn Tech Work 6, 239–246 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0162-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0162-2

Keywords

Navigation