Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reliability of a Single Pulse Oximetry Reading as a Screening Test for Congenital Heart Disease in Otherwise Asymptomatic Newborn Infants: The Importance of Human Factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of routine pulse oximetry to detect neonates with undiagnosed congenital heart disease before nursery discharge has been studied. The reported sensitivities with asymptomatic patients have been less than expected and vary widely, bringing into question the reliability of the test. This study aimed to assess whether routine pulse oximetry contributes to identifying patients with critical congenital heart disease, and to determine the reliability of a single pulse oximeter reading for screening asymptomatic newborn infants.

Methods

Between December 26, 2003 and December 31, 2005, three hospitals in west central Florida performed pulse oximetry routinely on all newborns at the time of discharge. Patients who received a diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease during the study period were identified to assess whether the pulse oximetry reading initiated their diagnosis. In one hospital, the pulse oximeter data were evaluated for reliability. Downloaded data were compared to a log compiled by the nursery personnel, first without (Phase 1) and then with (Phase 2) their knowledge and additional training. The results were characterized as reliable, probe placed but reading not verifiable, or no evidence of probe placement.

Results

Among the 7,962 infants who received oximetry testing, there were 12 postnatal diagnoses of critical congenital heart disease. None was initially identified by routine pulse oximetry. Pulse oximetry reliability improved substantially between Phases 1 and 2 (38% vs 60%; p < 0.0001). Optimal reliability (>95%) was obtained by a nurse with a licensed practical nurse degree or higher performing an assessment of at least 360 s.

Conclusion

Routine pulse oximetry was neither reliable nor an important diagnostic tool for our cohort. Important human factors (probe placement time, oximetry training, and nursing degree) have an impact on single-determination pulse oximetry reliability. With routine surveillance and quality improvement, the reliability of this test can be increased. Future studies to determine the effectiveness of pulse oximetry screening for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the asymptomatic newborn population must address these factors. Until such a study demonstrates acceptable sensitivity and clinical value, universal screening should not be instituted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu-Harb M, Wyllie J, Hey E (1994) Presentation of obstructive left heart malformations in infancy. Arch Dis Child 71:F179–F183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arlettaz R, Seraina Bauschatz A, Munkhoff M, Essers B, Bauersfeld (2006) The contribution of pulse oximetry to the early detection of congenital heart disease in newborns. Eur J Ped 165:94–98

  3. Bakr AF, Habib HS (2005) Combining pulse oximetry and clinical examination in screening for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 26:832–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker SG (2002) “Motion-resistant” pulse oximetry: a comparison of new and old models. Anesth Analg 95:967–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De-Wahl Granelli A, Mellander M, Sunnegardh J, Sandberg K, Ostman-Smith I (2005) Screening for duct-dependent congenital heart disease with pulse oximetry: a critical evaluation of strategies to maximize sensitivity. Acta Paediatrica 94:1590–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elsas LJ (1996) Newborn screening. In: Rudolph AM (ed) Rudolph’s pediatrics. Appleton and Lange, Stamford, CT, pp. 282–288

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman JIE (1990) Congenital heart disease: incidence and inheritance. Pediatr Clin North Am 37:25–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoke TR, Donahue PK, Bawa PK, Mitchell RD, Pathak A, Rowe PC, Byrne BJ (2002) Oxygen saturation as a screening test for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 23:403–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koppel RI, Druschel C, Carter T, Goldberg BE, Mehta PN, Talwar R, Bierman FZ (2003) Effectiveness of pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns. Pediatrics 111:451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuehl KS, Loffredo CA, Ferencz C (1999) Failure to diagnose congenital heart disease in infancy. Pediatrics 103:743–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawless ST (1994) Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 22:981–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liske MR, Greeley CS, Law DJ, Reich JD (2006) Report of the Tennessee task force on screening newborn infants for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 118(4):E125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mellander M, Sunnegardh J (2006) Failure to diagnose critical heart disease in newborns before discharge-an increasing problem? Acta Pediatrica 95:407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell SC, Korones SB, Berendes HW (1971) Congenital heart disease in 56,109 births: incidence and natural history. Circulation 43:323–332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Poets CF, Southall DP (1994) Noninvasive monitoring of oxygenation in infants and children: practical considerations and areas of concern. Pediatrics 93:737–746

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reich JD, Miller S, Brogdon B, Casatelli J, Gompf TC, Huhta JC, Sullivan K (2003) The use of pulse oximetry to detect congenital heart disease. J Peds 142:268–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Richmond S, Reay G, Abu Harb M (2002) Routine pulse oximetry in the newborn. Neonat Intensive Care 15:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richmond S, Wren C (2001) Early diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Semin Neonatol 6:27–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosati E, Chitano G, Dipaola L, De Felice C, Latini G (2005) Indications and limitations for a neonatal pulse oximetry screening of critical congenital heart disease. J Perinat Med 33:455–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salyer JW (2003) Neonatal and pediatric pulse oximetry. Respir Care 48:386–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Samanek M, Zborilova B, Hrobonova V (1989) Prevalence, treatment, and outcome of heart disease in live born children: a prospective analysis of 91,823 live-born children. Pediatr Cardiol 10:205–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thoele DG, Muster AJM, Paul Milton PH (1987) Recognition of coarctation of the aorta: a continuing challenge for the primary care physician. AJDC 141:1201–1204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Varan B, Tokel K, Yilmaz G (1999) Malnutrition and growth failure in cyanotic and acyanotic congenital heart disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. Arch Dis Child 81:49–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ward KE, Pryor RW, Matson JR (1996) Delayed detection of coarctation in infancy: implications for timing of newborn follow-up. Pediatrics 86:972–976

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L (1999) Presentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: implications for routine examination. Arch Dis Childhood 80:F49–F53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Angela J. Liske, MD, for her editorial assistance. This study was supported by a grant from the Lakeland Regional Medical Center Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Watson Clinic LLP, The Watson Clinic Center for Research, 1600 Lakeland Hills Boulevard, Lakeland, FL, 33805, USA

    J. D. Reich, B. Connolly, G. Bradley, S. Littman & W. Koeppel

  2. Department of Epidemiology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    P. Lewycky

  3. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA

    M. Liske

Authors
  1. J. D. Reich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Connolly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Bradley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Littman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W. Koeppel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Lewycky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Liske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Reich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reich, J.D., Connolly, B., Bradley, G. et al. Reliability of a Single Pulse Oximetry Reading as a Screening Test for Congenital Heart Disease in Otherwise Asymptomatic Newborn Infants: The Importance of Human Factors. Pediatr Cardiol 29, 371–376 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-007-9105-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-007-9105-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation