Abstract
Probabilities of hospital mortality provide meaningful information in many contexts, such as in discussions of patient prognosis by intensive care physicians, in patient stratification for analysis of clinical trial data by researchers, and in hospital reimbursement analysis by insurers. Use of probabilities as binary predictors based on a cut point can be misleading for making treatment decisions for individual patients, however, even when model performance is good overall. Alternative models for estimating severity of illness in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, while demonstrating good agreement for describing patients in the aggregate, are shown to differ considerably for individual patients. This suggests that identifying patients unlikely to benefit from ICU care by using models must be approached with considerable caution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829
Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636
Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin JS, Gehlbach SH, Rapoport J (1993) Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270: 2478–2486
Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D et al (1994) Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 h: a prospective, multicenter study. Crit Care Med 22:1351–1358
Lemeshow S, Teres D (1994) The MPM system for ICU patients. In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 805–815
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, and the ICU Scoring Group (1994) The SAPS II: a new score with new objectives. In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 795–804
Hadron D, Keeler E, Rogers W, Brook R (1993) Assessing the performance of mortality prediction models. Rand/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research, Santa Monica
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York
Lemeshow S, Le Gall JR (1994) Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients: a systems update. JAMA 272: 1049–1055
Civetta JM (1989) The clinical limitations of ICU scoring systems. In: Farmer JC, Kirby RR, Taylor RW (eds) Problems in critical care. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 681–695
Brody BA (1989) The ethics of using ICU scoring systems in individual patient management. In: Farmer JC, Kirby RR, Taylor RW (eds) Problems in critical care. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 662–670
Civetta JM (1992) Critical care: how should we evaluate our progress? Crit Care Med 20:1714–1720
Brown D (1992) View from the forum. Cortlandt Forum August:19–27
Schuster DP (1992) Predicting outcome after ICU admission. The art and science of assessing risk. Chest 102: 1861–1870
Teres D, Lemeshow S (1994) Why severity models should be used with caution. Crit Care Clin 10:93–110
Suter PM, Armaganidis A, Beaufils F, Bonfill C, Burchardi H, Cook D, Fago-Largeault, A, Thijs L, Vesconi S, Williams A, Le Gall JR, Chang R (1994) Predicting outcome in ICU patients. Consensus conference organized by the ESICM and the SRLF. Intensive Care Med 20:390–397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lemeshow, S., Klar, J. & Teres, D. Outcome prediction for individual intensive care patients: Useful, misused, or abused?. Intensive Care Med 21, 770–776 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01704747
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01704747