Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome prediction for individual intensive care patients: Useful, misused, or abused?

Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probabilities of hospital mortality provide meaningful information in many contexts, such as in discussions of patient prognosis by intensive care physicians, in patient stratification for analysis of clinical trial data by researchers, and in hospital reimbursement analysis by insurers. Use of probabilities as binary predictors based on a cut point can be misleading for making treatment decisions for individual patients, however, even when model performance is good overall. Alternative models for estimating severity of illness in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, while demonstrating good agreement for describing patients in the aggregate, are shown to differ considerably for individual patients. This suggests that identifying patients unlikely to benefit from ICU care by using models must be approached with considerable caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin JS, Gehlbach SH, Rapoport J (1993) Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270: 2478–2486

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D et al (1994) Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 h: a prospective, multicenter study. Crit Care Med 22:1351–1358

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lemeshow S, Teres D (1994) The MPM system for ICU patients. In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 805–815

    Google Scholar 

  6. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    Google Scholar 

  7. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, and the ICU Scoring Group (1994) The SAPS II: a new score with new objectives. In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 795–804

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hadron D, Keeler E, Rogers W, Brook R (1993) Assessing the performance of mortality prediction models. Rand/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lemeshow S, Le Gall JR (1994) Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients: a systems update. JAMA 272: 1049–1055

    Google Scholar 

  11. Civetta JM (1989) The clinical limitations of ICU scoring systems. In: Farmer JC, Kirby RR, Taylor RW (eds) Problems in critical care. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 681–695

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brody BA (1989) The ethics of using ICU scoring systems in individual patient management. In: Farmer JC, Kirby RR, Taylor RW (eds) Problems in critical care. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 662–670

    Google Scholar 

  13. Civetta JM (1992) Critical care: how should we evaluate our progress? Crit Care Med 20:1714–1720

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brown D (1992) View from the forum. Cortlandt Forum August:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schuster DP (1992) Predicting outcome after ICU admission. The art and science of assessing risk. Chest 102: 1861–1870

    Google Scholar 

  16. Teres D, Lemeshow S (1994) Why severity models should be used with caution. Crit Care Clin 10:93–110

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suter PM, Armaganidis A, Beaufils F, Bonfill C, Burchardi H, Cook D, Fago-Largeault, A, Thijs L, Vesconi S, Williams A, Le Gall JR, Chang R (1994) Predicting outcome in ICU patients. Consensus conference organized by the ESICM and the SRLF. Intensive Care Med 20:390–397

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lemeshow, S., Klar, J. & Teres, D. Outcome prediction for individual intensive care patients: Useful, misused, or abused?. Intensive Care Med 21, 770–776 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01704747

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01704747

Key words

Navigation