Table 3

Comparison of generated nasopharyngeal end-expiratory pressure (pEEP) and nasopharyngeal end-expiratory carbon dioxide concentration (pEECO2) in each weight group and flow rate

pEEPpEECO2
HFNC flow rate (L/min)Weight category (g)Mean±SDP value*Mean±SDP value†
2<10003.0±1.60.0211.6±1.30.014
1000–15002.3±1.22.2±1.7
>15001.8±0.73.2±1.5
3<10004.2±1.90.0051.10±0.990.003
1000–15003.2±1.51.73±1.54
>15002.6±0.62.96±1.41
4<10005.0±1.90.0050.6±0.60.001
1000–15003.6±1.32.0±1.6
>15003.4±0.92.5±1.4
5<10004.6±1.5NS0.7±0.70.002
1000–15004.0±1.22.0±2.1
>15003.9±1.62.5±1.6
6<10005.5±2.2NS0.5±0.8<0.0001
1000–15004.4±1.21.3±1.5
>15004.5±1.32.2±1.5
7<10005.9±2.5NS0.2±0.3<0.0001
1000–15005.1±1.41.1±1.6
>15005.1±1.81.9±1.5
8<10006.6±2.5NS0.2±0.4<0.0001
1000–15006.0±2.01.2±2.1
>15005.8±1.81.8±1.5
  • Infants weighing <1000 g n=15, 1000–1500 g n=15, >1500 g n=14.

  • Expressed in means±SD.

  • *Jonckheere-Terpstra test for ordered alternatives showed that there was a statistically significant trend of higher pEEP in infants weighing <1000 g compared with infants 1000–1500 g and/or >1500 g at flows 2–4 L/min.

  • †Jonckheere-Terpstra test for ordered alternatives showed that there was a statistically significant trend of lower pEECO2 in infants weighing <1000 g compared with larger weight groups infants 1000–1500 g and/or >1500 g across all flows.

  • NS, non-significant.