Table 1

Incidences of IH in preterm infants reported in the literature

Study (Ref.)Survey period/sourceAge range covered for IH occurrenceTarget populationN infants includedIH incidence
N (%)
Comment
Holmdahl231951–1954 hospital basedBirth to 20 weeksBW ≤2000 g
BW 2010–2500
BW ≥2500
293
347
186
20 (6.8)
16 (4.6)
15 (8.1)
Inconsistencies in text and tables.
Results potentially questionable.
Powell et al241980–1981 Epidemiologic, regional based, retrospective, registers and chartsSurvivors, birth to 1 yearBW ≤2000 g
GA 25–29 wk
GA 30–34 wk
GA 35+ wk
615
85
300
230
68 (11.1)
16 (18.8)
33 (11.0)
19 (8.3)
Incidence increases with decreasing GA, p=0.015
Boys vs girls: 9% vs 13% p=0.02
No selection bias
Amir et al251977–1984 retrospective hospital based charts and clinic reportsSurvivors, birth to 1 yearBW <2000 g
BW 500–1000 g
BW 1001–1500
BW 1501–2000
973
96
418
459
78 (12.7)
22 (22.9)
58 (13.9)
44 (9.6)
Male to female ratio 1:1.4. Frequency increases with decreasing BW
Queisser-Luft et al261990–1991 Register of congenital MalformationsFirst 10 daysAll newborns8332225 (2.7)Type of haemangioma and GA or BW not indicated
Haggstrom et al19Sept 2002–Oct 2003Not definedInfants referred to seven paediatric dermatology clinics <12 years1058 to compare with US National Vital Statistics SystemInfants with IH more likely: female p<0.00 001;
white p<0.0001;
preterm/very preterm p<0.0001; LBW/VLBW p<0.0001;
to have mother >30 years
Garzon et al22Sept 2002–Oct 2003 Prospective. Practices based Not definedInfants referred to seven paediatric dermatology practices833 term; 214 pretermFemale to male ratio 2.62; female to male ratio 1.85 p=0.04; mean no. of IH/patients: term vsGA<32 wk=1.4:1.8 p<0.001
IH in face: less in preterms p<0.005. Relevant referral bias
Drolet BA24Sept 2002–Oct 2003 ProspectiveNot definedInfants referred to two paediatric hospitals420 IH; 353 controlsInfant with IH are more likely to be preterm p<0.0001; female p<0.0001; LBW p<0.0001; white p<0.0001. Every 500 g decrease=IH increase by 40%. Relevant referral bias
Praveen et al272000–2005 Retrospective evaluation of neonatal databaseBirth to dischargeBW ≤1250 g35149 (14)Recruitment stopped at discharge
Dickison et al282007–2011 Prospective.
Hospital based
Birth to 24 wkNewborns with maternal consent1065; term 933; pret 13219 (2.0)
9 (6.8)
Female to male ratio 5:1;
not all infants <32 wk included. Relevant recruitment bias
Kanada et al20Not reported; hospital based; prospectiveBirth to 3 mAll newborns594 term; 523 pret 7122 (4.3) 7 (9.8)Relevant recruitment bias
Doege et al291999–2005 hospital based charts; retrospectiveDuring neonatal periodGA <37 wk
GA 23–26
GA 27–30
GA 31–34
GA 35–36
2563
155
346
1038
1024
110 (4.3)
24 (15)
41 (12)
40 (4)
5 (0.5)
Result potentially underestimating true incidence: incomplete chart documentation, recruitment stopped at discharge
  • BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age; IH, infantile haemangioma; pret, preterm; (V)LBW, (very) low birth weight; vs, versus; wk, weeks.