Table 2

Characteristics of included studies: participants, intervention, and outcome

Trial (year published)ParticipantsSettingInterventionsOutcomes (n/N)Notes
Gross (1983)1267 preterm infants (27–33 weeks gestation). Birth weight <1600 g. Excluded if “congenital anomaly or major disease, or if growth restricted.”Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, USA. 1980–82.Donor human, term (N=20) or preterm (N=21) milk versus standard-calorie formula milk (N=26). Feeds assigned until infant weight reached 1800 gNEC (confirmed): Donor human milk: 1/41 Formula milk: 6/26NEC was a withdrawal criterion not primary end-point of the study.
Lucas (1990)3159 infants, birth weight <1850 g. Infants with congenital abnormalities excluded.Neonatal units in Anglia, UK. Early 1980sDonor (mainly drip) human milk (N=83) versus calorie-enriched formula as sole diet (N=76)NEC (suspected and confirmed): Donor human milk: 3/83 Formula milk: 6/76 NEC (confirmed only): Donor human milk: 1/83 Formula milk: 4/76Parallel study assessed outcomes in infants who received donor human milk or formula as a supplement to the mother’s expressed breast milk.
Svenningsen (1982)1036 low birth weight infants.Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Early 1980sDonor human milk (N=6) versus standard-calorie formula milk (N=30)NEC (confirmed): Donor human milk: 0/6 Formula milk: 0/30Feeds randomly allocated in second week of life.
Tyson (1983)1181 very low birth weight infants, excluding infants with “any significant illness” or those who required ventilatory support at day 10 of lifeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas, Dallas, USA. Early 1980sDonor human milk (N=37) versus calorie-enriched formula (N=44).NEC (suspected and confirmed): Donor human milk: 0/37 Formula milk: 2/44 NEC (confirmed only): Donor human milk: 0/37 Formula milk: 1/44NEC reported as withdrawal criterion rather than outcome. Feeds allocated on the tenth day of life and continued until the infant reached a weight of 2000 g