Table 3

Summary of principal covariate models tested in population analysis (one compartment structure)

Model number Covariate model ΔOFV Comparison
model
1Basic model0.0
2Does weight influence CL77.81Yes
(CL = θ1 × weight, V = θ2)
3Is an intercept required?0.02No
(CL = θ1 + θ2 × weight, V = θ3)
4Does PCA influence CL?98.01Yes
(CL = θ1 × PCAθ2, V = θ3)
5Does creatinine concentration influence CL?100.11Yes
(CL = θ1 × creatinineθ2, V = θ3)
6Can 1/creatinine be substituted for creatinineθ2?−4.95Yes
(CL = θ1 / creatinine, V = θ2)
7Does adding weight to CL improve model 6?57.36Yes
(CL = θ1 × weight / creatinine, V = θ2)
8Does adding PCA improve model 7?0.07No
(CL = θ1 × weight / creatinine × PCAθ2, V = θ3)
9Does weight influence V?73.57Yes
(CL = θ1 × weight / creatinine, V = θ2 × weight)
10Does adding IV nutrition improve model 9?8.29Yes3-150
(CL = θ1 × weight / creatinine × (1 + θ2(NT)), V = θ3 × weight)
11Does adding gestational age <35 weeks improve model 9?7.99Yes3-150
(CL = θ1 × weight / creatinine × (1 + θ2 (GA)), V = θ3 × weight)
  • ΔOFV = difference in objective function value (>7.9 is significant at p<0.005 for the addition of 1 parameter); θ1...5 = parameter to be estimated; V = volume of distribution; CL = clearance; PCA = postconceptual age; NT = 1 if patient given IV nutrition or 0 otherwise; GA = 1 if gestational age is less than 35 weeks or 0 otherwise;

  • 3-150 Borderline significance, omitted from the final model.