RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 UK neonatal resuscitation survey
JF Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
JO Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
SP F324
OP F325
DO 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315526
VO 104
IS 3
A1 Elinor Charles
A1 Katie Hunt
A1 Vadivelam Murthy
A1 Christopher Harris
A1 Anne Greenough
YR 2019
UL http://fn.bmj.com/content/104/3/F324.abstract
AB Background Previous surveys have demonstrated that neonatal resuscitation practices on the delivery suite vary between UK units, particularly according to the hospital’s neonatal unit’s level. Our aim was to determine if recent changes to the Resuscitation Council guidelines had influenced clinical practice.Methods Surveys of resuscitation practices at UK delivery units carried out in 2012 and 2017 were compared.Results Comparing 2017 with 2012, initial resuscitation using air was more commonly used in both term (98% vs 75%, p<0.001) and preterm (84% vs 34%, p<0.001) born infants. Exhaled carbon dioxide monitoring was more frequently employed in 2017 (84% vs 19%, p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in practices according to the level of neonatal care provided by the hospital.Conclusion There have been significant changes in neonatal resuscitation practices in the delivery suite since 2012 regardless of the different levels of neonatal care offered.