TY - JOUR T1 - Reliability of NNAP's RoP screening data JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition JO - Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed SP - F519 LP - F520 DO - 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307127 VL - 99 IS - 6 AU - Neil Finer AU - Vivienne van Someren AU - Saurabh Jain Y1 - 2014/11/01 UR - http://fn.bmj.com/content/99/6/F519.abstract N2 - We were concerned by the data in the most recent National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) annual report (2012),1 showing that our unit screened only a small minority of eligible babies for retinopathy of prematurity (RoP). We reanalysed the data to explain these findings, and found them to be inaccurate. In doing so, we identified flaws in NNAP's data collection processes that have implications for all units. NNAP sets a standard for 100% of babies <32 weeks’ gestation or <1501 g birth weight to be screened within a defined period. Babies are screened by an ophthalmologist. Neonatal clinicians then upload the data onto Clevermed's ‘Badger’ (or upgraded ‘Badgernet’) platform, for analysis by the Neonatal … ER -