Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Cost effective use of satellite packs in neonates: importance of birth weight
  1. A Gupta,
  2. R Patel,
  3. M Dyke
  1. Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, Devon, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr A Gupta
    Neonatal Registrar, NICU, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK; amitguptablissdoctors.net.uk

Abstract

Background: Blood banks split an adult packed red cell bag (usually 250 ml) into 30 ml bags, making a total of eight neonatal “satellite” packs per donor. These packs are then “allocated”/“committed” to be used to serially transfuse a newborn.

Aim: To study transfusion requirements of premature infants in relation to their birth weight and thereby attempt to rationalise the method of dispensing satellite blood packs.

Method: Data on the distribution of neonatal transfusions with respect to weight were obtained retrospectively from unit A (51 infants, 168 transfusions) and unit B (46 infants, 151 transfusions). These data were used to model the effect of different policies on donor exposure and number of unused packs.

Results: Infants weighing less than 1000 g at birth have significantly higher transfusion requirements than those weighing1000 g or more (p = 0.001 (unit A), p = 0.004 (unit B)). Our model predicted a significant reduction in donor exposure if eight packs/infant were allocated to those weighing < 1000 g, and a significant cut in the number of unused packs if four satellite packs/infant were allocated to those weighing ⩾ 1000 g.

Conclusions: It would be safer and cost effective to allocate eight packs/infant to those with birth weights < 1000 g and four packs/infant to those with birth weights ⩾ 1000 g.

  • birth weight
  • transfusion
  • satellite packs
  • low birth weight
  • donor exposure

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health