Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Young adult reflections on life experiences following preterm birth: a cross-sectional descriptive study
  1. Cheryl Anne Mackay1,2,
  2. Caitlin Gray3,
  3. Catherine Campbell4,
  4. Mary Sharp1,2
  1. 1 Neonatal Directorate, Government of Western Australia Child and Adolescent Health Service, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  2. 2 School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia - Perth Campus, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  3. 3 The Kids Research Institute Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
  4. 4 Neonatology, Government of Western Australia Child and Adolescent Health Service, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Cheryl Anne Mackay; Cheryl.Mackay{at}health.wa.gov.au

Abstract

Background Increasingly, preterm-born children are entering adulthood as survival at earlier gestational ages improves. However, there is little understanding of the lived experience in preterm-born adults.

Methods A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted including young adults from a regional birth cohort of infants born <33 weeks in Western Australia. Participants provided written reflections of their experiences growing up and included messages for future families experiencing preterm birth. Content analysis was conducted according to SRQR (Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines. Ethics approval was granted by the Women and Newborn Health Service Ethics Committee.

Results Forty-one adults reflected on their life experiences, and 31 included messages for future families. Two predominant themes were (1) neonatal experiences and (2) experiences from childhood and adulthood which were divided into ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ subthemes. Participants made 44 references to the neonatal period: 31 (70.5%) ‘challenging’ including sickness (17, 54.8%), uncertainty (10, 32.3%), family separation (4, 12.9%); and 13 (29.5%) ‘positive’ including survival (6, 46.2%), support (5, 38.5%), strength (2, 15.4%). Childhood and adulthood was described as ‘positive’ in 119 (73.5%) references including a good life (41, 33.3%), supportive family (20, 16.3%), success (18, 14.6%), strength (18, 14.6%), gratitude (15, 12.2%), positive self-talk (7, 5.7%); and ‘negative’ in 43 (26.5%) including health challenges (19, 44.2%), school difficulties (10, 23.3%), family difficulties (9, 20.9%). Messages for future families included what to expect (56, 75.7%) and helpful advice (18, 24.3%).

Conclusion Our preterm-born young adults predominantly describe positive life experiences of childhood and adulthood balanced with an awareness of particular challenges.

  • Neonatology
  • Paediatrics
  • Qualitative research
  • Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
  • Follow-Up Studies

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors CAM: Data curation, formal analysis, resources, software, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. CG: Conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing, and guarantor. CC: Conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing. MS: Conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing.

  • Funding Funding for the study was provided by the Women and Infants Research Foundation (WIRF).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.