Article Text

Early-onset neonatal sepsis in the Paris area: a population-based surveillance study from 2019 to 2021
  1. Paola Sikias1,
  2. Valérie Biran2,3,
  3. Laurence Foix-L'Hélias4,5,
  4. Céline Plainvert6,7,
  5. Pascal Boileau8,9,
  6. Stéphane Bonacorsi10,11
  7. the EOS study group
    1. 1 Hôpital Privé d' Antony, Ramsay Santé, Antony, France
    2. 2 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Universitaire Robert Debré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
    3. 3 FHU I2D2, UMR 1131, INSERM, Paris, France
    4. 4 Department of Neonatology, Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
    5. 5 Paris Sorbonne University, Paris, France
    6. 6 Service de Bactériologie ; Centre National de Référence des Streptocoques, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre Site Cochin, Paris, France
    7. 7 Université de Paris, Paris, France
    8. 8 Department of Neonatal Pediatrics, Poissy Saint-Germain Hospital, Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines University, Poissy, France
    9. 9 UFR des sciences de la santé Simone Veil, Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines University, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
    10. 10 Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Robert Debré, CNR Escherichia coli, Paris, France
    11. 11 Université de Paris, IAME, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
    1. Correspondence to Dr Paola Sikias, Hôpital Privé d' Antony, Antony, France; paola.sikias{at}gmail.com

    Abstract

    Background Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) is a rare condition but an important cause of severe morbidity and mortality in neonates.

    Methods This is a prospective observational study in neonates born at ≥34 weeks of gestation (WG). The primary endpoint was EOS, defined by isolation of pathogenic species from blood culture and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture within 72 hours after birth. Data on EOS were collected exhaustively from all maternity wards in Paris area (April 2019–March 2021).

    Results 108 EOS were recorded (annual incidence, 0.32 per 1000 live births; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.38). In term infants, the most frequent pathogens were group B Streptococcus (GBS) (n=47) and Escherichia coli (n=20); in late preterm infants, the most frequent pathogens were E. coli (n=15) and GBS (n=7). Fifteen meningitis cases were diagnosed. Five E. coli strains (14%) were resistant to both amoxicillin and gentamicin, which is an empiric treatment for EOS. Of the 54 infants with GBS infections, 35 were born from mothers with negative GBS prepartum screening test and 8 from mothers with no screening. Two deaths were reported, both in term infants (Proteus mirabilis and E. coli).

    Conclusion In neonates ≥34 WG born in the Paris area, GBS was twice as frequent as E. coli in term infants. EOS was six times more frequent in late preterm than in term infants and was due to E. coli in 60% of cases. Prevention of GBS EOS and empiric antibiotic treatment of EOS could be improved.

    • neonatology
    • infectious disease medicine
    • epidemiology
    • sepsis

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request.

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

    • Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) has a low incidence in developed countries but has potentially serious consequences.

    • In France, prevention of EOS due to group B Streptococcus (GBS) is mainly based on antepartum GBS screening test.

    • The French Society of Neonatology published guidelines in 2017 for EOS in neonates ≥34 weeks of gestation; epidemiological and management data on EOS should be updated.

    WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

    • The annual incidence of EOS was 0.32 per 1000 live births and was six times more frequent in late preterm than in term infants.

    • Eleven newborns (10.2%) remained asymptomatic (seven of them were born in chorioamnionitis background), indicating that clinical examination alone may not be sufficient for EOS diagnosis.

    • 68.6% of 35 strains of Escherichia coli were resistant to amoxicillin and 14.3% were resistant to both amoxicillin and gentamicin.

    HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

    • Our results encourage the use of peripartum sensitive GBS screening test using PCR.

    • Close monitoring of E. coli aminoglycoside resistance is essential to adapt empiric antibiotic treatment in infants with suspected sepsis whose mothers received adequate antibiotic prophylaxis for GBS infection.

    Introduction

    Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) has a low incidence in developed countries but has potentially serious consequences. The incidence of EOS within 72 hours after birth regardless of term was estimated between 0.7 and 1.1 per 1000 live births in the USA.1–4 Mortality varies according to the gestational age of the newborn, from 2% to 3% in term infants to more than 20% in preterm infants,2 and is even higher in cases of meningitis, at 10% and 26%, respectively.5 In developed countries, EOS in term and near-term infants is mainly due to group B Streptococcus (GBS) (40%–50% of cases) and Escherichia coli (10%–20%).1 2 6 7 Although GBS is the most common pathogen, mortality is most frequently due to E. coli.3 8

    There is no national EOS register in France. Since 2011, only the incidence of early neonatal GBS infections has been reported and was estimated to be ~0.20 per 1000 live births by the French network EPIBAC.9 Proven EOS is rare, but suspicion of EOS is fairly common in daily practice. Previous studies showed that more than half of neonates in France had a gastric aspirate at birth,10–12 which may have led to unnecessary complementary examinations, and 4% of infants received antibiotic treatment for suspected EOS.12 The French Society of Neonatology and the French Society of Pediatrics have updated in 2017 the guidelines for EOS in neonates ≥34 weeks of gestation (WG).13 Briefly, symptomatic newborns are treated empirically with antibiotics, and for asymptomatic newborns a categorical approach based on peripartum risk factors and intrapartum antibiotics identifies those who require serial clinical monitoring every 4 hours through 48 hours of age. Two years after the release of the new recommendations, the creation of an observatory in the Paris area appeared necessary. The primary objective was to estimate the annual incidence and pathogen distribution in EOS. The secondary objective was to describe the clinical characteristics of mothers and infants and their management.

    Materials and methods

    Study design and patients

    This was an exhaustive, prospective, observational, multicentre study (from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2021) of EOS in neonates born at 34 WG in the Paris area (formally, Île-de-France region). The Paris area is the largest region in France (14 million inhabitants in 2021) and the largest urban region in the European Union. The Paris area had 81 maternity wards at the beginning of the study, 3 of which closed in 2020.

    EOS was defined as a positive blood culture and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture to a pathogen within 72 hours after birth. Infants were excluded when the organism was a contamination such as coagulase-negative staphylococci, Micrococcus, Bacillus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium species, or if sepsis was secondary to another infection or a particular disease such as enterocolitis in Hirschsprung’s disease.

    Recruitment took place at the time of diagnosis, after families received information and agreed to participate. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

    Data collection

    A weekly reminder email was sent to all neonatologists and bacteriologists in the Paris area to report each EOS. The following data were recorded by a senior paediatrician: infant and maternal demographics, maternal risk factors, maternal antibiotic therapy peripartum, notably GBS antibiotic prophylaxis (adequate: penicillin, ampicillin or cefazoline administered at least 4 hours before delivery; inadequate in other cases) or antibiotic therapy within 72 hours of delivery, newborn clinical signs, C reactive protein, blood culture, cerebrospinal fluid culture, antibiotic therapy of infants and the outcomes, and antibiotic resistance of GBS and E. coli strains. When lumbar puncture was performed after starting antibiotic therapy, a positive bacterial PCR in the cerebrospinal fluid allowed to retain the diagnosis of meningitis.

    Completeness of cases of bacterial infections was checked by recapturing the data from the bacteriologists associated with maternity wards (except for 5 out of 81). Five cases of EOS were retrieved from the computerised data of bacteriologists and were included in the study after consent of the parents.

    Statistical analysis

    Analyses were essentially descriptive and no formal hypotheses were tested. The primary outcome was the incidence rate, defined as the number of cases of EOS per 1000 births, with Wilson’s 95% CI, diagnosed among live neonates ≥34 WG in all maternity wards in the Paris area. The total number of live births during this period was provided by the regional health agency (Agence Régionale de Santé; ARS) of the Paris area and allowed calculation of annual incidence rates.

    Results

    Incidence of early-onset sepsis

    The study included 108 neonates born at ≥34 WG with a positive blood culture and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture to a bacterial pathogen within 72 hours after birth between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2021. Among them, 83 were term infants (≥37 WG). During the 2-year study period, a total of 346 162 live births (gestational age ≥34 WG) were recorded in the Paris area (16 786 for neonates 34–36 WG and 329 376 for neonates ≥37 WG). The incidence of EOS was therefore 0.32 per 1000 live births: 1.49 per 1000 for late preterm infants (34–36 WG) and 0.26 per 1000 for term infants (≥37 WG) (table 1).

    Table 1

    Annual incidence of early-onset neonatal sepsis in the Paris area in late preterm (34–36 WG) and term (≥37 WG) infants

    The 108 cases of EOS were 107 bacteraemia (including 14 associated with meningitis) and 1 meningitis with a negative blood culture. In term neonates, the most frequent pathogens were GBS (n=47) and E. coli (n=20), while in late preterm (34–36 WG) the most frequent were E. coli (n=15) and GBS (n=7) (table 2). The annual incidence of GBS EOS was 2.8 times higher in late preterm infants (0.42 per 1000 births) than in term infants (0.15 per 1000), and the incidence of E. coli EOS was 14 times higher in late preterm infants (0.89 per 1000) than in term infants (0.06 per 1000) (table 1).

    Table 2

    Pathogens evidenced in blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures according to the term of neonates

    Characteristics of mothers and infants

    The characteristics of mothers and infants are described in table 3. The known antenatal risk factors among the population of infected neonates were intrapartum maternal temperature >38°C (38.0%), membrane rupture >12 hours (29.6%), unexplained preterm birth (18.5%), positive GBS screening test (15.1%) and history of neonatal GBS infection (2.8%) (table 3). In addition, no GBS screening test was available at birth in 13.9%.

    Table 3

    Characteristics of infants and mothers at inclusion in the study and according to gestational age and pathogens

    Clinical signs of infection were present in 97 infants (89.8%), most frequently (n=94) in the first 48 hours after birth. Eleven newborns remained asymptomatic, seven of them were born in chorioamnionitis background.

    Antibiotic treatment within 3 days before labour onset had been administered to 16 (14.8%) women (amoxicillin alone or in combination): 14 in mothers of infants infected with E. coli (40%), while the 2 other infants were infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae and Citrobacter koseri, respectively. The reason was a prolonged membrane rupture for 15 of them and a pyelocaliceal dilatation for the last one. Out of 16 infants, 8 were born before 37 WG.

    A total of 43 (39.8%) women received intrapartum antibiotic treatment, consisting mainly of amoxicillin alone or in combination (37 out of 43, 86.0%) (table 3).

    E. coli infection was more frequent than GBS infection in the case of intrapartum antibiotic treatment (60.0% vs 22.2%) and membrane rupture >12 hours (60.0% vs 9.3%); moreover, no GBS infection was observed in the case of adequate intrapartum antibiotic treatment (table 3).

    All infants had at least one C reactive protein measurement. C reactive protein was ≥10 mg/L for the first sample in 47.2% (n=51) and in 96.3% (n=104) for the maximal value in serial samples.

    Antibiotic treatment of neonates and outcomes

    The most frequent initial treatment of neonates was an amoxicillin–gentamicin combination (60.2%) (table 4). The initial treatment was modified in 55 infants (50.9%): in 19 cases (17.6%) the antibiotic spectrum was reduced and broadened in 36 cases (33.3%).

    Table 4

    Initial antibiotic treatment for early-onset neonatal sepsis and clinical evolution of infants

    Almost all infants (93.5%) were transferred to another department (table 4). Of the 108 infants with EOS, 106 (98.1%) were discharged alive and 2 (1.9%) died during hospitalisation.

    Antibiotic resistance

    All GBS strains were susceptible to amoxicillin and only one had a high level of resistance to gentamicin (1.8%); 33.3% were resistant to clindamycin. Resistance to kanamycin/amikacin was assessed in 36 of the 54 GBS strains and 16.7% (6 out of 36) were found resistant.

    Among the 35 E. coli isolates, 68.6% (24 out of 35) were resistant to amoxicillin and 14.3% (5 out of 35) produced an extended spectrum beta-lactamase and were resistant to cefotaxime (table 5). Five isolates (14.3%) were resistant to both amoxicillin and gentamicin, and four (11.4%) to both cefotaxime and gentamicin. Only one strain was resistant to amikacin. Of the 35 E. coli strains, 22 (62.9%) were K1, including all E. coli meningitis.

    Table 5

    Antibiotic resistance of 35 Escherichia coli strains

    Among the 35 neonates infected with E. coli, 14 mothers did not receive any peripartum antibiotic therapy; 5 (35.7%) of these 14 E. coli strains were resistant to amoxicillin and only 1 out of 14 (7.1%) to cefotaxime (table 5). All were sensitive to gentamicin. One of the 35 mothers had an inadequate peripartum antibiotic therapy; the E. coli strain was sensitive to amoxicillin and gentamicin. Twenty mothers had an adequate peripartum antibiotic therapy, including 14 of them within 3 days before delivery. A total of 19 (95%) of these 20 E. coli strains were resistant to amoxicillin, 4 (20%) to cefotaxime, 5 (25%) to gentamicin and 1 (5%) to amikacin.

    Discussion

    We present for the first time the incidence, microbiology, epidemiology, mortality and risk factors for EOS in neonates ≥34 WG based on a 2-year prospective study performed among 346 162 newborns in all maternity wards in the largest region of France. We report an incidence of EOS in neonates ≥34 WG equal to 0.32 per 1000 live births (95% CI 0.26 to 0.38). The incidence was six times higher in the late preterm infants compared with those born at term (1.49 vs 0.26 per 1000, respectively).

    In a retrospective study between 1993 and 2003 in 14 hospitals in the USA, Puopolo et al 7 reported an incidence of EOS of 0.58 per 1000 live births ≥34 WG (1.2 per 1000 in the 34–36 WG group and 0.53 per 1000 in the ≥37 WG group). More recently, Stoll et al,4 in a prospective study in 18 Neonatal Research Network centres in the USA, observed an incidence of 0.73 per 1000 live births in late preterm neonates (34–36 WG) and 0.56 per 1000 live births in neonates at term.

    GBS antepartum screening test was positive in 14 out of 93 (15.1%) mothers (15 women were not tested). This prevalence is consistent with that of a meta-analysis reporting an estimated mean prevalence of rectovaginal GBS colonisation of 19.0% (95% CI 16.1 to 22.0) in Europe.14 Universal culture-based screening for GBS carriage (vaginal swab) at 34–38 WG is recommended for pregnant women by the French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.15 This examination is covered at 100% by social security. Since the generalisation of GBS screening and peripartum antibiotic prophylaxis, the majority of cases of GBS-associated EOS have occurred in newborns whose mothers have been screened negative for GBS.7 16 In our study, this rate was 76% (35 out of 46). Six other mothers (4 GBS and 2 E. coli) had not been screened for GBS and had no other EOS risk factors. We can speculate that more GBS EOS would have been prevented by peripartum sensitive GBS screening test using PCR. Indeed, 71 maternity wards used only prepartum culture for GBS screening, 8 used peripartum PCR in addition to prepartum culture and 2 only peripartum PCR. Of note, no GBS EOS occurred after adequate intrapartum antibiotic treatment.

    The French guidelines for EOS in infants ≥34 WG are based on the assessment and stratification of infectious risk to initiate a reinforced clinical monitoring (online supplemental file 1).13 There was no antepartum or peripartum risk factor in 34 cases of EOS (31.5%) in our cohort. Thus, our results confirm that an infection cannot be ruled out in infants without perinatal risk factors. Furthermore, 29% (10 out of 34) of these infants with no risk factors became symptomatic within 12 hours after birth (5 GBS, 2 E. coli, 1 Campylobacter jejuni, 1 K. pneumoniae and 1 Proteus mirabilis).

    Consistent with our results, several studies reported that 80%–90% of infants became symptomatic within the first 48 hours after birth.17 18 In our study, 10.2% of infants remained asymptomatic. Cantoni et al 19 found no difference in clinical outcomes in term infants who were monitored with serial physical examinations versus those who additionally received laboratory testing. Escobar et al,20 using a predictive EOS risk model, stated that the risk of EOS in asymptomatic infants was very low. Wortham et al,21 in a prospective study of EOS conducted among 396 586 living births in 16 US centres from 2006 to 2009, reported 389 cases of EOS. Records of 229 of them born to mothers with chorioamnionitis were reviewed and the authors found 21 (9%) infants who remained asymptomatic within 72 hours after birth. Altogether, these results suggest that clinical monitoring alone may not be sufficient to detect all EOS. Thus, the 11 cases of asymptomatic EOS were diagnosed after gastric aspirate or C reactive protein measurement. Compared with blood culture, laboratory tests currently used, such as C reactive protein22 or procalcitonin,23 have however poor positive predictive value and lack specificity.

    Empiric antibiotics were administered to most infants, generally amoxicillin–gentamicin combination (60.2%) according to the recent French recommendations for suspected EOS in infants ≥34 WG without signs of severity.13 Amoxicillin was ineffective in almost all E. coli strains (19 out of 20) from mothers who received amoxicillin within 3 days before delivery or as adequate peripartum antibiotic prophylaxis.

    The strengths of this observational study are mainly its prospective design, the inclusion of all maternity wards of a region and the recapture of all EOS cases via the microbiology laboratories associated with these maternity wards. All parents of infants with EOS gave their consent and all infants with EOS were born in the Paris area (no transfer from another region). The recovery of all EOS cases was therefore systematic and we can assume quasi-exhaustiveness. Our study provides, for the first time, a reliable EOS rate in the largest region of France for the overall neonatal population and according to pathogens and pregnancy term. The limitations of the study are mainly related to the fact that we did not know the exact duration of membrane rupture (only ≤12 hours or >12 hours was recorded) and the exact value of maternal peripartum temperature (≤38°C or >38°C). In addition, we did not differentiate chorioamnionitis from isolated maternal fever peripartum.

    In conclusion, the EOS rate was 0.32 per 1000 live births in neonates aged ≥34 WG born in the Paris area. EOS was six times more frequent in late preterm infants; GBS was twice as frequent as E. coli in term infants, but this ratio was reversed in late preterm infants. These data encourage the use of the PCR method for screening of GBS during labour. Monitoring EOS epidemiology, and in particular the incidence of Gram-negative bacteria and their rate of antibiotic resistance, seems fundamental to adjust EOS empiric treatment.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    This study involves human participants and conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. A local independent ethics committee - institutional review board ('Ramsay Santé Recherche & Enseignement'; IRB00010835) gave favourable opinion and the need for ethical committee approval by a 'Committee for the Protection of Persons' (CPP) was waived because the study was purely observational. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

    References

    Supplementary materials

    • Supplementary Data

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Footnotes

    • Collaborators EOS study group: Groupe Hospitalier de l’Est Francilien: Meaux-Jossigny-Coulommiers (F Faibis, C Harvel, L Karaoui, A Chalvon, MC Semenescu, C Delahaye, M Haroun); Pontoise (MA Yangui, D Todorova, D Roca, P Martres); Debré (A Rideau, P Mariani, A Heneau, C Farnoux, A Frerot, AL Virvoulet); Trousseau (F Kieffer, I Guellec, M Lachtar, S Vimont, R Dahoumane, D Moissenet); Gonesse (S El Dannawi, M Lakhdari, L Djamdjian); CH 4 Villes (B Harvey, H Rey, N Miled); Diaconesses (C Weill, S Ishak, B Heym); Bluets (A Fichter, F Minier, S Vimont); Necker (JF Magny, A Lapillonne, C Pichon, E Bille); Béclère (V Zupan, O Romain, D de Luca, R BenAmmar, E Letamendia, N Bourgeois); Louis Mourier (S Coquery, L Desfreres, L Landraud, L Houhamdi); Corbeil (M Granier, H Razafimahefa, S Lefoulgoc, S Kubab, F Lorme); Centre Hospitalier de Neuilly (P Gatel, H Pejoan, I Worcel); Mignot (M Rajguru, J Grine, M Amara); Cerballiance Hôpital Privé d’Antony (E Lamar, A Lesenne, S Lefrancois); Sainte-Félicité (J Gholizadeh, B Carpentier, C Desanges); Melun (A Pitsch, R Meziane, M Ilunga Muamba); Argenteuil (D Brault, D Andriamanjato, A Claudinon); Créteil (G Dassieu, X Durrmeyer, C Jung, L Ratsimbazafy, N Soismier, F Dugelay, S Aberrane); Longjumeau (J Gaschignard, S Ducrocq, M Meric, F Reibel); Villeneuve Saint-Georges (D Dubrez, K Nguyen, C Corlouer); Mantes-la-Jolie (B Yakeu, N Covtun, E Riverain); Fontainebleau (I Wiser, M Louis); Pitié-Salpétrière (J Wirth, A Ousser, J Robert); Institut Franco-Britannique (J Rozental, C Allouche, E Farfour); Lariboisière (B Bercot, MD Moreno, A Coursol, HD Huynh, H Jacquier, G Peandeponfilly, C Renolleau); Clinique de l’Estrée (T Bitar, F Abou Assi, V Vieillefond); Port-Royal (S Parat, PH Jarreau, C Poyart, A Tazi); Saint-Denis (P Bolot, C Chaplain, C Bercaru); Montreuil (P Daoud, G Escourrou, M Challier, R Bouaziz); Poissy (C Castel, M Cheron); Orsay (C de Gennes, M Evrevin, S Gobet); Aulnay-sous-Bois (A Zakaria, A Surdu, E Collin, H Porcheret); Montmorency (A Hassoun, E Vallée); Sarcelles (S El Dannawi); Blanc Mesnil (P Mussat, M Lakhdari, P Clément); Montfermeil (M Khaled, A Drid, C Guyot); Hôpital Privé de Versailles (J Gholizadeh); Hôpital Américain (L Louvet); Clinique Vauban (M Naas); Armand Brillard (A Dufougeray); Noriets (I Bey, A Dufougeray); Saint-Maurice (D Planchenault, N Soismier); Clinique Claude-Bernard (J Gholizadeh); Hôpital Privé Marne-la-Vallée (A Dufougeray); Clinique Claude Galien (S Lefrançois, C Bourdais); Clinique l’Isle-Adam (M Arditti); Arpajon (K Kassab, B CartierRivere, L Demayer); Tenon (M Bourennane, N Kraim, S Vimont); Trappes (H Kannan); Beaumont-sur-Oise (P Martres); Sainte-Thérèse (J Gholizadeh); Clinique de l’Yvette (S Lefrançois); Beaujon (F Bert); Bicêtre (M Mokhtari, C Boithias, J Raymond); Saint-Joseph (F Autret, N El Helali); Bondy (E Lachassine, C Roumegoux, I Poilane); Bichat (L Allal, L Armand); Foch (Y Coatantiec, A Cailho, E Farfour); Clinique Gaston Métivet (I Vermeulen); Montsouris (R Ajami, M Lavollay); Rambouillet (D Desbois); Provins (K Kherallah); Hôpital Européen de la Roseraie (MP Lacomme); Clinique Saint-Louis (E Lamar); Clinique des Lilas (JP Taar); Parly 2 (N Cadoudal); Clinique Meulan-en-Yvelines (H Ould); Clinique Lambert (J Gholizadeh); Clinique Jeanne-d’Arc (S Ishak); La Muette (V Napoly); Clinique du Tournan (M Arditti); Clinique du Mousseau (A Escuret); Montereau (H Hallage); Clinique de l’Essonne (T Allard); Saint-Germain-en-Laye (A Amara); Nanterre (G Galeazzi); Vert Galant (K Bergaoui); Etampes (I DeOliveira, A Emirian); Agence régionale de santé (C Crenn-Hebert).

    • Contributors PS initiated the study, wrote the protocol, implemented the study in all neonatology departments, maternity wards and bacteriological laboratories, was responsible for study data and analysis, wrote the article and was the guarantor of the study. SB was responsible for the study of E. coli strains and participated actively in the study and in writing the article. CP was responsible for the study of group B Streptococcus strains. VB, LF-L and PB participated in the writing of the successive versions of the manuscript. All authors validated the final version of the manuscript. All members of the EOS study group were responsible for the reporting of cases of EOS occurring in their departments and completed forms.

    • Funding The study was funded by Direction Recherche et Enseignement Ramsay Santé (grant number COS-RGDS-2018-12-045).

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.