Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Availability of active therapeutic hypothermia at birth for neonatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: a UK population study from 2011 to 2018
  1. Aarti Mistry1,
  2. Lara Shipley1,
  3. Shalini Ojha1,
  4. Don Sharkey1,2
  5. UK Neonatal Transport Research Collaborative (UK-NTRC)
    1. 1 Centre for Perinatal Research (CePR), University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
    2. 2 UK Neonatal Transport Research Collaborative (UK-NTRC), Neonatal Transport Group, Nottingham, UK
    1. Correspondence to Professor Don Sharkey, Centre for Perinatal Research (CePR), University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK; don.sharkey{at}nottingham.ac.uk

    Abstract

    Objective Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) commenced soon after birth for neonatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) improves survival and reduces neurodisability. Availability of active TH at the place of birth (Immediate-TH) in the UK is unknown.

    Design Population-based observational study.

    Setting UK maternity centres.

    Patients 5 975 056 births from 2011 to 2018.

    Intervention methods For each maternity centre, the year active Immediate-TH was available and the annual birth rates were established. Admission temperatures of infants with HIE transferred from non-tertiary centres with and without Immediate-TH were compared.

    Main outcome measures Quantify the annual number of births with access to Immediate-TH. Secondary outcomes included temporal changes in Immediate-TH and admission temperatures for infants requiring transfer to tertiary centres.

    Results In UK maternity centres, 75 of 194 (38.7%) provided Immediate-TH in 2011 rising to 95 of 192 (49.5%, p=0.003) in 2018 with marked regional variations. In 2011, 394 842 (51.2%) of 771 176 births had no access to Immediate-TH compared with 276 258 (39.3%) of 702 794 births in 2018 (p<0.001). More infants with HIE arrived in the therapeutic temperature range (76.5% vs 67.3%; OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.0, p<0.001) with less overcooling (10.6% vs 14.3%; OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.98, p=0.036) from centres with Immediate-TH compared with those without.

    Conclusions Availability of active Immediate-TH has slowly increased although many newborns still have no access and rely on transport team arrival to commence active TH. This is associated with delayed optimal hypothermic management. Provision of Immediate-TH across all units, with appropriate training and support, could improve care of infants with HIE.

    • neonatology
    • healthcare disparities
    • intensive care units, neonatal
    • epidemiology
    • health services research

    Data availability statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All National Birth statistics were obtained from publicly available databases. All survey data from UK-NTRC was contributed freely and under consent of each UK Neonatal Transport service. NNRD data extracted and supplied by the Neonatal Data Analysis (NDAU) were available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of the study team and NDAU.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All National Birth statistics were obtained from publicly available databases. All survey data from UK-NTRC was contributed freely and under consent of each UK Neonatal Transport service. NNRD data extracted and supplied by the Neonatal Data Analysis (NDAU) were available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of the study team and NDAU.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @AartiMistry5, @DrLTurner, @shaliniojha7, @DrDonSharkey

    • Collaborators On behalf of the UK-NTRC, an affiliated group of the UK-NTG: E Adams, I M Dady, H Darby, S J Davidson, N Davey, N Fowler, C H Harrison, A Jackson, J Madar, A Leslie, S Pattnayak, A Philpott, N Ratnavel, S Rattigan, J Tooley, P Turton, M S Reddy, P Sakhuja, R Tinnion, A Walker and L Watts. Collaborators' affiliations are as follows: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Connect North West Neonatal Transport Service, Manchester University NHS Foundation; University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; CenTre Neonatal Transport Service, University Hospitals of Leicester; Embrace Transport service, Sheffield Children’s NHS Trust; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Scottish Specialist Transport and Retrieval Service, Princess Royal Maternity, Glasgow; Kent Neonatal Transport Service, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Kent; KIDS-Neonatal Transfer Service; London Neonatal Transport Service, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London; Acute Neonatal Transfer Service, East of England; Newborn Emergency Stabilisation and Transport Team, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston Foundation NHS Trust; Northern Neonatal Transport Service; The Grange University Hospital, Cwmbran; London Neonatal Transfer Service, Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Northern Ireland Specialist Transport and Retrieval and University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust.

    • Contributors DS is the guarantor of this study. AM and DS made substantial contributions to the concept, planning, design of the study and acquisition of data. LS and DS collated the secondary outcome data from the NNRD. The UK Neonatal Transport Research Collaborative (UK-NTRC) helped identify centre equipment access and revised the final manuscript. AM, LS, SO and DS assisted in drafting and editing the manuscript. All authors approved the final version for publication.

    • Funding AM was part of the project funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) i4i programme (II-LA-0715-20003) and DS was a co-investigator on the same award.

    • Disclaimer The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

    • Map disclaimer The inclusion of any map (including the depiction of any boundaries therein), or of any geographic or locational reference, does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or of its authorities. Any such expression remains solely that of the relevant source and is not endorsed by BMJ. Maps are provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.