Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Deferred consent for delivery room studies: the providers’ perspective
  1. Maria C den Boer1,2,
  2. Mirjam Houtlosser2,
  3. Elizabeth E Foglia3,
  4. Enrico Lopriore1,
  5. Martine Charlotte de Vries2,4,
  6. Dirk P Engberts2,
  7. Arjan B te Pas1
  1. 1Division of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Medical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
  3. 3Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  4. 4Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Maria C den Boer, Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2300 RC, The Netherlands; m.c.den_boer{at}lumc.nl

Footnotes

  • Contributors MCdB and MH drafted the initial version of the manuscript, and all authors participated in critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

  • Funding ABtP is recipient of an NWO Innovational Research Incentives Scheme (VIDI 91716428).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval This study was reviewed by the Ethics Review Committee of the LUMC. In concordance with laws and guidelines, a statement of no objection against execution of the study at the LUMC and the HUP was issued (P16.316).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors MCdB and MH drafted the initial version of the manuscript, and all authors participated in critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

  • Funding ABtP is recipient of an NWO Innovational Research Incentives Scheme (VIDI 91716428).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval This study was reviewed by the Ethics Review Committee of the LUMC. In concordance with laws and guidelines, a statement of no objection against execution of the study at the LUMC and the HUP was issued (P16.316).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.