Aim To determine the impact of the pumping regimes of women with preterm infants on the daily milk production, and on the short-term rate of milk synthesis during early lactation to support evidence-based recommendations for optimising milk production.
Methods Mothers of preterm infants (n=25) recorded start time, finish time and expression volumes from every breast expression on days 10, 15–20 postpartum.
Results Expressing more often than five times per day did not result in a significant increase in daily milk production. Milk volume per expression per breast increased for intervals between expressions of between 2and6 hours then reached a plateau when the interval between expression was 7 hours or longer. The short-term rate of milk synthesis decreased as the interval between expressions increased until about 7.5 hours at which point it begun to increase (p value associated with interval between expressions^2<0.001).
Conclusion The strong inverse association between the short-term rate of milk synthesis and the interval between expressions for intervals up to 7 hours suggest that the maximum interval between expressions should be 7 hours. Data suggest that, on average, the mothers should express at least five times a day to maximise daily milk production. Considering inter-individual variation, determination of an individual mother’s maximum interval between expressions that does not compromise the short-term rate of milk synthesis will help to optimise daily milk production while minimising the demands on the mother’s time.
- milk production
- breast expression
- pumping regime
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors CTL performed literature search, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing and submitting of the manuscript. AR was involved in data analysis and critically reviewed the manuscript. JCK and LM were involved in interpretation of the data and critically reviewed the manuscript. PEH, KS and DTG were involved in the supervision of the study, acquisition of funding and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors were approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding Funding for this study was provided by an unrestricted research grant from Medela AG, Baar, Switzerland.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval The Ethics Committee of King Edward Memorial Hospital (818/EW).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement The deidentified data that used and presented in this study can be obtained from the corresponding author.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.