Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Full term; an artificial concept
  1. Neil Marlow
  1. Correspondence to Neil Marlow, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK; n.marlow{at}ucl.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Babies born between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation are considered to have been born at the optimal time, and earlier or later delivery is known to be associated with increased risk of a range of outcomes from neonatal complications to impaired outcomes in terms of physical and intellectual ability and even death. Originally, there was an uncertainty about the length of gestation, because the basis for calculating gestational age (from the first day of the last menstrual period) was acknowledged as inaccurate due to conception at different points during the menstrual cycle and variation in an individual woman's cycle, thus a wide definition of full term was developed. With demand-led timing of delivery increasing around the world, many more babies are therefore delivered electively at 37–38 completed weeks of gestation, despite guidance from a range of official bodies.1

This rather artificial concept is further cemented in place with the use of ‘full term’ comparison groups in many studies as the reference population. Indeed there is currently much research interest in the moderate or late …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.