Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial

Claus Klingenberg; Marit Pettersen; Elin A Hansen; Linn J Gustavsen; Ingvild A Dahl; Arild Leknessund; Per I Kaaresen; Marianne Nordhov

doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-304525

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via RCPCH

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

Podcasts

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via RCPCH

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

Original article

Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Klingenberg C, Pettersen M, Hansen EA, et al

Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial

Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2014;99:F134-F137.

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password