Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Prevention of preterm births: are we looking in the wrong place? The case for primary prevention
  1. Rohini Rattihalli,
  2. Lucy Smith,
  3. David Field
  1. Department of Health Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor D Field, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK; df63{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


Preterm birth is the major cause of neonatal and infant mortality in the developed world, being responsible for 55% and 43% of neonatal and infant deaths, respectively, in England and Wales.1 With nearly 50 000 preterm births (before 37 weeks gestation) a year in England and Wales (7.6%), the burden is large and research has estimated the annual cost of these babies to be nearly £3 billion2 reflecting both initial care costs and ongoing morbidity.

To date, both the clinical response and the research agenda have concentrated on two main areas: (1) optimising neonatal care practices and interventions and (2) secondary preventive strategies after preterm birth is threatened or an underlying condition recognised. In terms of neonatal care, there have been major advances in the past 30 years particularly in infants of 32 weeks gestation or less; however, it is unlikely that further dramatic changes will be seen particularly among those babies born at the borders of viability. In the same period, obstetric research has focused on strategies to prevent preterm birth once it is threatened but although progesterone therapy is currently showing some promise,3 other obstetric measures have shown little benefit.4

Dealing with identifiable risks for preterm birth

In taking this approach, the impact of those conditions, behaviours and lifestyles affecting the mother (such as diabetes, obesity and smoking) that are part of the morbidity and mortality associated with preterm birth have received much less attention.5 Similarly, clinicians and academics have, until very recently, largely concentrated on very preterm births (ie, <33 weeks of gestation) and moderate preterm infants have been seen as presenting little problem despite their relatively large numbers. However, emerging …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.