Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Effect of co-infusion of dextrose-containing solutions on red blood cell haemolysis during packed red cell transfusion
  1. M J Stark1,2,
  2. C Story3,
  3. C Andersen1
  1. 1Department of Perinatal Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
  2. 2The Robinson Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
  3. 3SA Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michael Stark, Department of Perinatal Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, 72 King William Road, Adelaide, Australia; michael.stark{at}


Aim Transfusion guidelines prohibit co-infusion of maintenance intravenous fluid solutions, with significant consequences for neonatal clinical care. This study investigated co-infusion–related haemolysis in an in vitro model closely resembling clinical practice.

Methods Packed red blood cells (PRBCs, n=8) were co-infused at 5 and 10 ml/h with dextrose 5%, 10% and intravenous amino acid solution (synthamin). Free haemoglobin (fHb), as a measure of haemolysis, was measured by spectrophotometry and presented as % haemolysis and total fHb content (µmol/l).

Results Following co-infusion, there was no significant increase in PRBC haemolysis with either type of solution co-infused (p=0.82) or infusion rate (p=0.5). Neither macroscopic nor microscopic agglutination was observed during co-infusion for any type of solution co-infused.

Conclusions Co-infusion does not result in increased haemolysis, with total fHb significantly lower than currently accepted safe thresholds for fHb. Adherence to current guidelines may place undue restrictions on current transfusion practice in neonatal intensive care.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.