Objective To describe the use of heel blood sampling and non-pharmacological analgesia in a large representative sample of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in eight European countries, and compare their self-reported practices with evidence-based recommendations.
Methods Information on use of heel blood sampling and associated procedures (oral sweet solutions, non-nutritive sucking, swaddling or positioning, topical anaesthetics and heel warming) were collected through a structured mail questionnaire. 284 NICUs (78% response rate) participated, but only 175 with ≥50 very low birth weight admissions per year were included in this analysis.
Results Use of heel blood sampling appeared widespread. Most units in the Netherlands, UK, Denmark, Sweden and France predominantly adopted mechanical devices, while manual lance was still in use in the other countries. The two Scandinavian countries and France were the most likely, and Belgium and Spain the least likely to employ recommended combinations of evidence-based pain management measures.
Conclusions Heel puncture is a common procedure in preterm neonates, but pain appears inadequately treated in many units and countries. Better compliance with published guidelines is needed for clinical and ethical reasons.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
ESF Network C Amiel-Tison, France; JV Browne, USA; M Cuttini, Italy; G Greisen, Denmark; D Haumont, Belgium; PS Hűppi, Switzerland; H Lagercrantz, Sweden; K Stjernqvist, Sweden; Warren, UK. ESF Officers: C Moquin-Pattey, M Minkowsky and B Schaller.
Funding This study was funded by the European Science Foundation Network on Research on Early Developmental Care for Extremely Premature Babies in neonatal intensive care units (http://www.esf.org/activities/networks/all-current-networks.html) and by the Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù of Roma, Italy (Grant no. OPBG 200580X001247).
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval As this study was carried out on units' policies, and not on human subjects, requirements for informed consent and Ethics Committee approval do not apply.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.