Responses

Download PDFPDF

Toxic additives in medication for preterm infants
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Alcohol Intake in Infants Treated with Oral Furosemide Solution

    It was with interest that I read the article by Whittaker et al regarding toxic additives in medication for preterm infants, particularly the assessment of alcohol intake in the infant population treated with furosemide oral solution. I was surprised by the statement “ethanol exposure in the preterm infants … ranged from 0.2mL to 1.8mL/ week uncorrected for weight, the equivalent of a 70kg man consuming between 1 and 7...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Additives in medication for preterm infants: documentation of exposure is only the first step…

    Dear editor, We thank Whittaker et al. to refocus on the use of additives in medications by illustrating the incidence and magnitude of exposure in a cohort of preterm neonates.1 We hereby would like to suggest to further extent the adagio of Paracelsus, that ‘all is toxic, it only depends on the dose’, by adding that the ‘recipient’ should also be considered. In addition to their paper, we felt it appropriated to mentio...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.