Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Pulse oximetry: not a sensitive screening tool for congenital heart disease

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Thangaratinam et al1 should be complimented on the well-conducted systematic review on the accuracy of pulse oximetry in screening for congenital heart disease (CHD) in asymptomatic neonates. It needs to be stressed that more than 60% of CHD is actually non-cyanotic, and pulse oximetry would offer little if any assistance in its detection. Clinical detection of cyanosis is highly clinician dependent, and mild cyanosis is likely to be missed by the relatively inexperienced. Routine pulse oximetry would certainly avoid this risk. Indeed low oxygen …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Linked Articles

  • Fantoms
    Ben Stenson