Download PDFPDF
Selective fluconazole prophylaxis in high-risk babies to reduce invasive fungal infection
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Practical approach to improve prophylaxis against fungal infections
    • Yoram A Bental, Neonatologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Imad R. Makhoul- Meyer Children's Hospital and The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine-Technion, Israel.

    áñ"ã To the Editor, We read with interest the article by McCrossan et al on selective fluconazole prophylaxis. Reviewing the data presented in Table 2, in 3 out of 4 infants with positive blood culture, cephalosporin was involved. A practical conclusion would be to eliminate the use of cephalosporin in VLBW infants. Another measure would be to shorten empiric antibiotic use to 3-4 days (if cultures prove to be negative)...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Prophylaxis to reduce fungal infection in neonates
    • Renato S Procianoy, Professor of Pediatrics, Head of the Newborn Section
    • Other Contributors:
      • Rita.C. Silveira

    The study by McCrossan et al showed that fluconazole prophylaxis in a selected group of preterm infants with birth weight less than 1,500 grams decreases invasive fungal infection [1]. We agree that a carefully delineated risk-factor approach to the prevention of Candida infection in neonates may be a useful alternative to continuous fluconazole prophylaxis and may decrease the risk of the emergence of fluconazole-resistan...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.