Background: Term newborns can compensate fully for an imposed dead space (tube breathing) by increasing their minute ventilation.
Objective: To test the hypothesis that infants of smoking mothers would have an impaired response to tube breathing.
Design: Prospective study.
Setting: Perinatal service.
Patients: Fourteen infants of smoking and 24 infants of non-smoking mothers (median postnatal age 37 (11–85) hours and 26 (10–120) hours respectively) were studied.
Interventions: Breath by breath minute volume was measured at baseline and when a dead space of 4.4 ml/kg was incorporated into the breathing circuit.
Main outcome measures: The maximum minute ventilation during tube breathing was determined and the time constant of the response calculated.
Results: The time constant of the infants of smoking mothers was longer than that of the infants of non-smoking mothers (median (range) 37.3 (22.2–70.2) v 26.2 (13.8–51.0) seconds, p = 0.016). Regression analysis showed that maternal smoking status was related to the time constant independently of birth weight, gestational or postnatal age, or sex (p = 0.018).
Conclusions: Intrauterine exposure to smoking is associated with a dampened response to tube breathing.
- MMV, maximum minute ventilation
- MV, minute volume
- respiratory control
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Infants whose mothers smoke during pregnancy are at increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome compared with infants of non-smoking mothers; the increase in risk has been reported to be twofold to fourfold, but as high as sixfold if associated with other risk factors.1–3 A possible explanation for the association is that the infants have neurodevelopmental abnormalities of the control of ventilation.4 If that explanation were correct, infants of smoking mothers would be predicted to have a reduced ventilatory response to hypercarbia.4–6 Term newborns can compensate fully for an imposed dead space (tube breathing) by increasing their minute ventilation.7 It has been argued that hypercarbia is the most important stimulus to ventilation during tube breathing.8,9 If then infants of smoking mothers do have neurodevelopmental abnormalities of ventilation, they would be predicted to have an impaired ventilatory response to tube breathing. The aim of this study was to test that hypothesis. We therefore compared the response to tube breathing of infants of smoking and non-smoking mothers, all examined in the first week after birth before discharge from hospital.
Infants of smoking and non-smoking mothers were recruited from the postnatal wards. Smoking status was determined by questioning the mothers and examining their antenatal records. Smoking mothers admitted smoking at least five cigarettes a day throughout pregnancy. Cigarette smoking was recorded to the nearest five cigarettes a day. Urinary cotinine concentrations were not assessed. Infants were recruited if born at term, more than 6 hours old, and had no obstetric or perinatal problems. Informed, written parental consent was obtained, and the study approved by the King’s College Hospital Ethics Committee.
Infants were studied while awake, but quiet. Their eyes were open, and the infants were breathing quietly when the measurements were made. A face mask was placed over the infant’s nose and mouth. A 7 mm tube led from the face mask to a pneumotachograph (PK Morgan, Rainham, Kent, UK) via a Y connector. The length of the tube between face mask and Y connector was adjusted such that its volume was 4.4 ml/kg body weight, twice the anatomical dead space. The pneumotachograph was attached to a differential pressure transducer (MP45; Validyne Corporation, Northridge, California, USA), the signal from which was recorded on a chart recorder (RS3600; Gould, Bilthoven, the Netherlands). Flow, measured from the pneumotachograph, was electronically integrated to give tidal volume and recorded on the chart recorder. From the tidal volume and the duration of inspiratory and expiratory cycle (which were used to calculate respiratory rate), the breath to breath minute volume (MV) was calculated. A second 7 mm tube connected the face mask to a three way tap through which a bias flow of 2 litres/min was delivered to the circuit. A third tube connected the three way tap to the remaining part of the Y connector (fig 1).
Baseline recordings of MV were made with the three way tap in the neutral position, so that the bias flow to the face mask eliminated any dead space. When the tap was rotated, the bias flow was fed via the third tube directly to the Y connector and the pneumotachograph so that the bias flow now bypassed the face mask. This resulted in the dead space of the second tube being added to the infant’s respiratory system. The infant breathed through the additional dead space until the breath by breath MV no longer increased, and the maximum minute ventilation (MMV) had been reached. The breath by breath MV was plotted against time. A polynomial regression line was drawn through the data points collected from when the infant started to breath through the additional dead space. The MMV and the time constant Tc (the time taken to achieve 63%) of the increase in MV were then calculated.10 In four infants, the study was repeated 15 minutes later; the coefficient of repeatability of Tc was 11 seconds.
Differences between the groups were assessed for statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U, the paired Wilcoxon, or χ2 test as appropriate. Logistic regression analysis was then performed to determine whether the smoking status of the mother predicted the Tc independently of birth weight, gestational age, postnatal age, and sex. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 12.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Recruitment of 14 infants into each group allowed, with at least 80% power at the 5% level, detection of a difference in the Tc greater than six seconds, about 50% of the coefficient of repeatability of the measurement. In a previous study,10 the mean Tc in term infants was 27–29.6 seconds, thus our sample size allowed us to detect a difference between the two groups of 25% or less of the Tc expected in term infants.10 Recruitment continued until 14 infants were recruited into the smoking group.
Thirty eight infants, including 14 of smoking mothers, were recruited. The median number of cigarettes per day smoked by the mother was five (range 5–15). The infants of the smoking and the non-smoking mothers were similar with regard to their sex distribution, birth weight, and gestational and postnatal age (table 1).
There were no significant differences between the baseline or “dead space added” tidal volumes, respiratory rates, or inspiratory or expiratory times of the two groups. In both groups, addition of the dead space caused significant increases in tidal volume and respiratory rate (table 2).
The baseline MV, the MMV, and the change in MV expressed as a percentage of the baseline MV did not differ significantly between the two groups. The median Tc of the infants of the smoking mothers was significantly greater than that of the infants of non-smoking mothers (p = 0.016) (fig 2; table 3). Regression analysis showed that the smoking status of the mother was significantly related to the Tc adjusted for birth weight, gestational and postnatal age, and sex (p = 0.018).
We have shown that infants of smoking mothers had a dampened ventilatory response to added dead space—that is, the time constant of the response was longer. The infants of smoking mothers tended, although not significantly, to be older than the infants of non-smoking mothers. Maturation and a greater response to tube breathing has been shown in the first 10 days after birth.10 Thus the poorer response of infants of smoking mothers is even more striking. Results of mouth pressure measurements 100 milliseconds after an airway occlusion at the onset of inspiration (P0.1) also suggested that infants of smoking mothers had a reduced ventilatory drive and there was a dose-response relation with the number of cigarettes smoked.11 A confident conclusion on the strength of respiratory drive of infants of smoking mothers, however, cannot be made on the basis of P0.1 measurement results, as the magnitude of P0.1 not only reflects respiratory drive, but also respiratory muscle strength.
Although the Tc differed significantly between the two groups, the MMV and change in MV during tube breathing were similar. It is possible that, as we based our sample size calculation on the Tc results, we may have had insufficient power to confidently detect differences in the other variables. Our results, however, showing a significant difference in Tc, but similar changes in MMV in the two groups are predictable from the results obtained in healthy infants.7 Healthy infants of more than 36 weeks of gestational age have been shown to be able to fully compensate with regard to their MV for two additional dead spaces.7 Hence, we predicted that the infants of smoking and non-smoking mothers would compensate for the added dead space with similar changes in MV, but the Tc of their response would differ and hence based our sample size calculation on Tc data.
The mechanisms by which babies increase their MV to compensate for added dead space are by increasing their tidal volume and their respiratory rate. In both groups in response to the added space, their tidal volume and respiratory rate significantly increased (table 2). In both groups, the increase in respiratory rate resulted from a significant reduction in expiratory time, but in the infants of non-smoking mothers there was also a shortening of the inspiratory time. The latter effect, although significant, however, was a mean difference of only 0.04 second.
The Tc—that is, to achieve 63% MMV during tube breathing—has been noted to be faster in active compared with quiet sleep when infants were examined in the first 10 days after birth.8 Thus, although the ventilatory responses preceding hypoxia induced arousal have not been shown to differ between sleep states,12 we took care to always test the infants when they were awake, but quiet, and so avoid a possible confounding effect of sleep state. We assessed the infants using behavioural criteria only, but when they were measured they were breathing regularly and had their eyes open, so we do feel they were awake rather than in active, rapid eye movement sleep. Previous studies examining ventilatory control have usually examined infants when asleep, this difference needs to be remembered when interpreting our results in the context of the literature. We assessed maternal smoking status by questioning the mothers and examining their antenatal records. Urinary cotinine concentrations were not assessed, nor did we have data on the mother’s exposure to smoking by others in her workplace. Infant hair urinary cotinine measurements in an early study,13 however, did not show overlap between a maternally declared exposure group and a control group, and a good correlation (r2 = 0.63) was found with maternal reports of smoking. Despite a lack of cotinine measurements in our study, we did find a significant difference in the response to the added dead space between infants whose mothers we classified as smokers and those as non-smokers.
Potentially, the apparatus resistance, hypoxia, and hypercarbia could have stimulated the infants’ ventilation during tube breathing.8 Experiments in which the dead space was ventilated by a fan showed, however, that only 28% of the increase in MV was due to the resistive effect of the added dead space tubing.8 In addition, measurements in air and 30% oxygen using a similar technique to that used in our study yielded similar results,8 suggesting that hypoxia is not a major stimulus. Thus hypercarbia would appear to be the most important stimulus to ventilation during tube breathing. Indeed, the addition of two added dead spaces has been shown to increase the end tidal CO2 by only 1.8 mm Hg.9 Thus, our data suggest that infants of smoking mothers might have a dampened ventilatory response to hypercarbia. The implications of this are that, in adverse conditions, affected infants may develop carbon dioxide retention and associated adverse consequences.
Studies examining the ventilatory response to hypercarbia in infants of smoking mothers have yielded conflicting results.4–6 Some have shown an increased response,5,6 whereas in a third study4 no significant difference was noted between infants of smoking and non-smoking mothers.4 In the first two studies,5,6 however, the response to a combined hypercapnic/hypoxic stimulus was examined, but in the third4 the hypoxic and hypercapnic stimuli were administered separately. In that study,4 however, the infants of the smoking mothers were significantly older than the control infants and this may have influenced the results. Both groups4 were examined between 2 and 3 months of age, whereas we assessed babies in the first week after birth, which may account for the differences in the results of the two studies. Previous studies4–6 have examined infants outside the neonatal period and thus the results could have been influenced by postnatal, as well as antenatal, smoking exposure. We therefore deliberately chose to examine infants in the first week after birth and importantly before hospital discharge. Thus the infants were likely to have only been exposed to antenatal smoking, thereby allowing us to examine whether antenatal smoke exposure alone influenced ventilatory control.
What is already known on this topic
Infants whose mothers smoke during pregnancy are at a sixfold increased risk for sudden infant death syndrome. It is possible that this is due to neurodevelopmental abnormalities of the control of ventilation.
What this study adds
We have shown that, in the perinatal period, infants of smoking mothers have a dampened ventilatory response to an imposed dead space. This result is compatible with dampened chemoreceptor function following in utero exposure to cigarette smoking.
Prenatal nicotine exposure results in cell death in the brainstem of animal models.14 The abnormalities may result from fetal hypoxia, as nicotine is a powerful vasoconstrictor and reduces blood flow to the uterus, as well as having a direct vasoconstrictor effect on the fetus.15 In addition, fetuses of smoking mothers have raised carboxyhaemoglobin concentrations, resulting in a decrease in fetal oxygen tension, a shift in the oxygen dissociation curve to the left, and a decrease in oxygen delivery to the tissues.16–18 Nicotine is also a specific neuroteratogen; exposure to nicotine during critical phases of central nervous system development has resulted in abnormalities of cell replication, cell differentiation, and receptor function in rat fetuses.19–21 Prolonged exposure to nicotine at low doses throughout gestation has led to altered brain development, corresponding to the appearance of nicotinic receptors in the midbrain22 and reductions in noradrenaline (norepinephrine) concentrations in the cerebral cortex, midbrain, and hippocampus.21 In human fetuses, high concentrations of nicotine binding sites in brainstem tegmental nuclei related to cardiopulmonary integration during mid-gestation may make those areas more susceptible to nicotine toxicity during critical periods of brain development.23 Both peripheral and central chemoreceptor function in lambs have been shown to be altered by nicotine.24 Such abnormalities may explain our finding of a dampened response to tube breathing in the infants of smoking mothers.
In conclusion, infants of smoking mothers had a dampened response to tube breathing compared with infants of non-smoking mothers. The major provoking stimulus to ventilation during tube breathing in the neonate is hypercarbia. Our results are compatible with dampened chemoreceptor function in infants exposed in utero to cigarette smoking. It is possible that this is a manifestation of neurodevelopmental abnormalities of the control of ventilation, which have been suggested to be a cause of the association of the increased rate of sudden infant death syndrome in infants of smoking mothers.4 Longitudinal studies are required to further test this hypothesis.
RB was supported by the Joint Research Committee, King’s College Hospital, and BK and SB by King’s College Hospital Trust. We thank Mrs Ashley Cain and Mrs Deirdre Gibbons for secretarial assistance.
Published Online First 5 May 2005
Competing interests: none declared
This study was approved by the King’s College Hospital Ethics Committee.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.