Objective: To evaluate the effects of prone and supine sleeping positions on electrocortical activity during active (AS) and quiet (QS) sleep in low birthweight infants.
Design: Randomised/crossover study.
Setting: Infant Physiology Laboratory at Children’s Hospital of New York.
Patients: Sixty three healthy, growing, low birthweight (birth weight 795–1600 g) infants, 26–37 weeks gestational age.
Interventions: Six hour continuous two channel electrocortical recordings, together with minute by minute behavioural state assignment, were performed. The infants were randomly assigned to prone or supine position during the first three hours, and positions were reversed during the second three hours.
Outcome measures and results: Fast Fourier transforms of electroencephalograms (EEGs) were performed each minute and the total EEG power (TP), spectral edge frequency (SEF), absolute (AP) and relative (RP) powers in five frequency bands (0.01–1.0 Hz, 1–4 Hz, 4–8 Hz, 8–12 Hz, 12–24 Hz) were computed. Mean values for TP, SEF, AP, and RP in the five frequency bands in the prone and supine positions during AS and QS were then compared. In the prone sleeping position, during AS, infants showed significantly lower TP, decreased AP in frequency bands 0.01–1.0 Hz, 4–8 Hz, 8–12 Hz, 12–24 Hz, increased RP in 1–4 Hz, and a decrease in SEF. Similar trends were observed during QS, although they did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions: The prone sleeping position promotes a shift in EEG activity towards slower frequencies. These changes in electrocortical activity may be related to mechanisms associated with decreased arousal in the prone position and, in turn, increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome.
- AP, absolute power
- AS, active sleep
- EEG, electroencephalograph
- LBW, low birth weight
- QS, quiet sleep
- RP, relative power
- SEF, spectral edge frequency
- SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome
- TP, total power
- sleep states
- sudden infant death syndrome
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Published Online First 27 April 2005
This study was performed in the Infant Physiology Laboratory at Children’s Hospital of New York, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Competing interests: none declared
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.