Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Fok et al1 note that the birth weight (BW) of the Chinese neonates they studied is lower than that of babies born in some western countries and state that a genuine genetic predisposition exists leading to the smaller size of Chinese infants.
In Tuscany, an Italian region with 3.4 million inhabitants, about 0.5% of the population are immigrants from the People’s Republic of China. Since the early 1990s, Chinese immigrants in Tuscany have formed a stable, endogamic, culturally defined, and economically well integrated community. They receive the same full free medical care as Italian citizens.
Using the registry of the Regional Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening Programme, which covers 99.9% of the Region’s neonates,2 we extracted the data for all the 4787 ethnic Chinese babies born in Tuscany from 1 July 1991 to 31 December 2002 to two ethnic Chinese parents. The forms that accompany the blood sample for the screening test are completed at birth by an obstetrician or nurse and contain the neonate’s sex, BW, and gestational age (GA). We calculated the mean BW of the Chinese babies for each sex and GA starting from the 35th week (missing data: 638 babies). To avoid errors in estimates, we excluded as unlikely for GA those BWs that were more than 1.5 interquartile ranges above the 75th or below the 25th centile for each GA and sex.3
Compared with native Tuscan newborns,4 Chinese babies born in Tuscany have a higher mean BW at almost all GAs; only at the 40th, 41st, and 42nd weeks for boys and 42nd week for girls is the mean BW of the Chinese babies slightly lower, but not significantly so. Compared with those born in China,1 Chinese babies born in Tuscany have a higher mean BW at all GAs, except for the 42nd week (girls). The differences we found are in many cases statistically significant, despite the small size of our population.
Our data conflict with the hypothesis of Fok et al that Chinese newborns have a genetic predisposition to a smaller size than their white counterparts and suggest that, to explain the differences in BW they found, maternal and environmental factors should be taken into consideration.