Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Low field strength magnetic resonance imaging of the neonatal brain
  1. E H Whitby1,
  2. M N Paley1,
  3. M F Smith2,
  4. A Sprigg3,
  5. N Woodhouse1,
  6. P D Griffiths1
  1. 1Section of Academic Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  2. 2Trent Regional Neonatal Unit, Jessop Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  3. 3Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Whitby, Department of Academic Radiology, Floor C, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK;
    e.whitby{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the neonate has been restricted by the need to transport the sick baby to the large magnetic resonance scanners and often the need for sedation or anaesthesia in order to obtain good quality images. Ultrasound is the reference standard for neonatal imaging.

Objective: To establish a dedicated neonatal MR system and compare the clinical usefulness of MR imaging with ultrasound imaging.

Design: Prospective double blind trial.

Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit, Sheffield.

Main outcome measures: Imaging reports.

Patients: 134 premature and term babies.

Results: In 56% of infants with pathology suspected on clinical grounds, MR provided additional useful clinical information over and above that obtained with ultrasound.

Conclusion: Infants can be safely imaged by dedicated low field magnetic resonance on the neonatal intensive care unit without the need for sedation at a cost equivalent to ultrasound.

  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • brain
  • ultrasound

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
  • Fantoms
    Martin Ward Platt