Responses

Download PDFPDF

Neonatal group B streptococcal infection in South Bedfordshire, 1993–1998
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Confirmed GBS infection - the tip of the iceberg

    Dear Editor:

    Beardsall et al are to be congratulated on presenting further evidence that group B streptococcus (GBS) gives rise to a significant burden of disease in some areas of the United Kingdom.[1] Retrospective data collected at St George’s is in agreement with the authors’ suggestion that culture proven sepsis under-represents the true burden of disease.

    Firstly we conducted a retrospective search...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Guidelines for Group B streptococcus
    Dear Editor

    As highlighted in a recent edition of ADC Fetal and Neonatal edition,[1, 2] there is increasing concern about the previously unreported high levels of neonatal group B Streptococcal (GBS) infections in the UK. It is indeed most important that we have national statistics for regional variations in GBS infection, for it is only when we have this information that we can begin to produce evidence based guid...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Guidelines for prevention of neonatal Group B Streptococcal infections
    • Yim-Yee Chan, Research Fellows
    • Other Contributors:
      • R Lakshman
    Dear Editor

    The article by Beardsall et al[1] once again raises awareness of this important and as yet unresolved issue for the UK. We would like to make two related points:

    (1) Although the authors have discussed both early and late onset Group B Streptococcus disease, perinatal intervention is effective in preventing only early onset Group B Streptococcus disease.

    (2) A common related scenario...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.